HP HPE-372f

Performance Results


Gaming 27% Raft	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 22% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	35.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	26% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	HP HPE-372f (all builds)
Motherboard	MSI 2A9C
Memory	5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100519
Uptime	1.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 09 '21 at 23:14
Run Duration	274 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	20%

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 860-$339 51,451 User benchmarks, average bench 64% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	69.5% Good	Memory 93.7 1-Core 74.9 2-Core 150 65% 106 Pts	4-Core 247 8-Core 359 38% 303 Pts	64-Core 357 22% 357 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 69.5% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500 94,130 User benchmarks, average bench 35% Gigabyte(1458 3001) CLim: 1100 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 20.11.2 Performing below potential (74^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	35.5% Below average	Lighting 49 Reflection 38.7 Parallax 62.8 40% 50.2 fps	MRender 30.2 Gravity 47.6 Splatting 24.2 27% 34 fps
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 35.5% Great: 39%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
3 240GB SSD 240GB 3,846 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 15GB free (System drive) Firmware: T0707B0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 11 29 33 10 27 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	26% Poor	Read 236 Write 113 Mixed 62.5 SusWrite 25.4 24% 109 MB/s	4K Read 13.8 4K Write 31.5 4K Mixed 1.3 39% 15.5 MB/s	DQ Read 142 DQ Write 57.7 DQ Mixed 0.5 27% 66.7 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 26% Great: 99%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$40 97,793 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 852GB free Firmware: JP4OA3BF SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 122 125 123 125 127 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	69.3% Good	Read 117 Write 125 Mixed 60.5 SusWrite 125 78% 107 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.9 161% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 69.3% Great: 74%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
FE02FE02 EBJ21UE8BDF0-DJ-F 4x2GB 699 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	41.3% Average	MC Read 15.1 MC Write 13.5 MC Mixed 12.7 39% 13.8 GB/s	SC Read 10.8 SC Write 10.4 SC Mixed 12.4 32% 11.2 GB/s	Latency 60.6 66% 60.6 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 41.3% Great: 43%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 24: 3R 2G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
24%	10%	77	313	242	60	72.3"	1097 617	ELE1366 31000743

History: Score 22: 1R 4G 5B | Score 8: 1R 1G 0B | Score 24: 3R 2G 3B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical HPE-372f Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 64%

Destroyer

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

System: HP HPE-372f

CPU
Core i7 860Intel $339Bench 64%, 51,451 samples	20x

GPU
HD 5770AMDBench 10%, 37,602 samples	5x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	3x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	2x

SSD
240GB SSD 240GB3Bench 64%, 3,846 samples	2x
WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GBWDCBench 93%, 97,462 samples	2x
Blue 3D 250GBWD $31Bench 86%, 23,658 samples	2x

RAM
EBJ21UE8BDF0-DJ-F 4x2GBFE02FE02Bench 38%, 699 samples	6x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 20,667 samples	2x
75TT13NU2R8-8G 2x8GBUnknownBench 30%, 5 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 61% - Good

Total price: $339

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16