Asrock A320M-DGS

Performance Results


Gaming 27% Raft	Desktop 59% Gunboat	Workstation 24% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	43.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	42.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (84%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock A320M-DGS (all builds)
Memory	8.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180103
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 09 '21 at 20:05
Run Duration	174 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	84%

Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1400-$87 71,313 User benchmarks, average bench 61% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	51.9% Above average	Memory 57.5 1-Core 62.2 2-Core 121 47% 80.4 Pts	4-Core 250 8-Core 372 39% 311 Pts	64-Core 421 26% 421 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 51.9% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155 259,091 User benchmarks, average bench 43% Gigabyte(1458 4027) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.96 Performing below potential (66^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	43.1% Average	Lighting 53.3 Reflection 56 Parallax 51.7 43% 53.7 fps	MRender 62.7 Gravity 50.1 Splatting 46.2 43% 53 fps
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 43.1% Great: 46%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Plextor PX-128S3G 128GB 1,438 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 24GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.04 SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 95 98 96 86 85 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	42.4% Average	Read 313 Write 95.3 Mixed 132 SusWrite 91.8 35% 158 MB/s	4K Read 11.3 4K Write 30.5 4K Mixed 16.4 54% 19.4 MB/s	DQ Read 227 DQ Write 103 DQ Mixed 115 98% 148 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 42.4% Great: 89%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$67 318,836 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 290GB free Firmware: MS2OA8J0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 114 105 115 119 108 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	72.7% Very good	Read 142 Write 146 Mixed 24.4 SusWrite 112 76% 106 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.6 133% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 72.7% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x8GB 236,291 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	62.3% Good	MC Read 24.1 MC Write 24.3 MC Mixed 24.9 70% 24.4 GB/s	SC Read 7.1 SC Write 14.8 SC Mixed 10.1 30% 10.7 GB/s	Latency 135 30% 135 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 62.3% Great: 97%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 45: 5R 4G 8B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
45%	33%	52	108	6	60	27"	1920 1080	SAM0D32 C27F390

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical A320M-DGS Builds (Compare 450 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-DGS

CPU
Ryzen 3 1200AMD $100Bench 57%, 83,528 samples	67x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	64x
Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples	49x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	80x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	34x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	20x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	19x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	11x
A400 120GBKingston $32Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	11x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	16x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	12x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 81% - Excellent

Total price: $187

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16