Acer Predator G3610

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics20.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive68.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAcer Predator G3610  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Predator G3610
Memory8.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110419
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 09 '21 at 15:28
Run Duration265 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$195
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
74.4% Very good
Memory 83.6
1-Core 96.9
2-Core 183
71% 121 Pts
4-Core 359
8-Core 468
53% 414 Pts
64-Core 467
29% 467 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 370-$153
CLim: 985 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.5.2
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
20.8% Poor
Lighting 26.2
Reflection 36.2
Parallax 32.7
21% 31.7 fps
MRender 27.8
Gravity 23.2
Splatting 22.6
20% 24.5 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 20.8%
Great: 23%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN128HCHP-000H1 128GB
53GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02H0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 148 140 138 145 149 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
68.6% Good
Read 468
Write 154
Mixed 193
SusWrite 145
53% 240 MB/s
4K Read 24.2
4K Write 48.2
4K Mixed 26.1
96% 32.8 MB/s
DQ Read 367
DQ Write 154
DQ Mixed 179
154% 234 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 87%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
623GB free
Firmware: JC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 96 95 96 94 95 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
52.8% Above average
Read 88.4
Write 83.2
Mixed 63.7
SusWrite 95.3
61% 82.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
178% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 68%
WD Elements 1TB
231GB free, PID 1078
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 25 25 25 25 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
13.7% Very poor
Read 28.7
Write 22.4
Mixed 20.5
SusWrite 24.9
32% 24.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
70% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 13.7%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya NT4GC64B8HB0NF-CG 3x4GB
3 of 4 slots used
12GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
28.2% Poor
MC Read 9.3
MC Write 8.6
MC Mixed 8.3
25% 8.73 GB/s
SC Read 8.9
SC Write 9.8
SC Mixed 9.6
27% 9.43 GB/s
Latency 74.1
54% 74.1 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 28.2%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 49: 6R 6G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
49% 18% 73 225 175 60 7.2" 1920 1080 GSM0001 LG TV
History: Score 16: 1R 3G 2B | Score 35: 4R 5G 0B | Score 49: 6R 6G 1B
Typical Predator G3610 Builds (Compare 347 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

System: Acer Predator G3610

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $354
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback