Gigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 56% Gunboat	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	15% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	60.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (66%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Gigabyte A320M-H
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF (all builds)
Memory	0.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200428
Uptime	0.8 Days
Run Date	Sep 09 '21 at 09:19
Run Duration	158 Seconds
Run User	IND-User
Background CPU	66%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G-$98 93,718 User benchmarks, average bench 68% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	50.1% Above average	Memory 59.3 1-Core 69.9 2-Core 137 51% 88.7 Pts	4-Core 223 8-Core 310 34% 266 Pts	64-Core 245 15% 245 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 50.1% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Nvidia(10DE 11BF) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.96 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	15% Very poor	Lighting 20 Reflection 39.1 Parallax 15.7 16% 24.9 fps	MRender 14.8 Gravity 19.9 Splatting 12 12% 15.6 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 15% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLH256HAJD-000H1 256GB 372 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 127GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT22H0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 205 202 199 189 175 210 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	60.5% Good	Read 365 Write 214 Mixed 225 SusWrite 197 56% 250 MB/s	4K Read 14.5 4K Write 51.8 4K Mixed 23.7 80% 30 MB/s	DQ Read 198 DQ Write 208 DQ Mixed 155 130% 187 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 60.5% Great: 94%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 215GB free Firmware: 17.01H17 SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 57 63 46 51 57 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	21.5% Poor	Read 19.8 Write 71.8 Mixed 21.5 SusWrite 55.2 31% 42.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.2 38% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 21.5% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905702-022.A00G 1x8GB 110 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	21% Poor	MC Read 6.3 MC Write 7.3 MC Mixed 9.8 22% 7.8 GB/s	SC Read 1.9 SC Write 2.8 SC Mixed 2.3 7% 2.33 GB/s	Latency 130 31% 130 ns
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 21% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	10	8	144	27"	1280 720	GSM5B71 27GL650F

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-A320M-H-CF Builds (Compare 2,888 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 29%

Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF

CPU
Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples	332x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $155Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	325x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $83Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	283x

GPU
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	225x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	192x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	171x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	163x
SU630 240GBAdataBench 64%, 60,212 samples	66x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $37Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	59x

RAM
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples	60x
DDR4 3200 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 87,891 samples	57x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	48x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 77% - Very good

Total price: $233

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16