Gigabyte GA-X299X AORUS XTREME WF

Performance Results


Gaming 105% UFO	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 80% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	198% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	244% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X299X AORUS XTREME WF (all builds)
Memory	52.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191003
Uptime	0.6 Days
Run Date	Sep 08 '21 at 21:01
Run Duration	225 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	62%

PC Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-10980XE-$1,100 4,959 User benchmarks, average bench 84% CPU0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	53.1% Above average	Memory 67 1-Core 98.4 2-Core 179 65% 115 Pts	4-Core 221 8-Core 261 31% 241 Pts	64-Core 264 16% 264 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 53.1% Great: 96%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,306 158,856 User benchmarks, average bench 210% Gigabyte(1458 403A) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 471.96 Performing below potential (17^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	198% Outstanding	Lighting 284 Reflection 244 Parallax 321 232% 283 fps	MRender 344 Gravity 252 Splatting 186 205% 261 fps
Poor: 185% ↑ This bench: 198% Great: 230%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$150 200,600 User benchmarks, average bench 336% 1.5TB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 794 1073 1327 1414 1418 1446 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	244% Outstanding	Read 1,839 Write 1,505 Mixed 1,431 SusWrite 1,245 338% 1,505 MB/s	4K Read 44.6 4K Write 114 4K Mixed 62.6 208% 73.9 MB/s	DQ Read 822 DQ Write 527 DQ Mixed 676 504% 675 MB/s
Poor: 223% ↑ This bench: 244% Great: 435%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$150 200,600 User benchmarks, average bench 336% 2TB free Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1505 1530 1521 1512 1533 1413 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	268% Outstanding	Read 1,865 Write 1,533 Mixed 1,412 SusWrite 1,502 354% 1,578 MB/s	4K Read 45.8 4K Write 127 4K Mixed 65.6 220% 79.3 MB/s	DQ Read 883 DQ Write 593 DQ Mixed 733 548% 736 MB/s
Poor: 223% ↑ This bench: 268% Great: 435%
Seagate Barracuda 6TB (2017)-$87 14,331 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 5.5TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 184 189 191 186 184 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 40% Great: 87%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 8x8GB 4,255 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 8 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	52.8% Above average	MC Read 10.5 MC Write 34.8 MC Mixed 14.3 57% 19.9 GB/s	SC Read 6 SC Write 19.2 SC Mixed 8.2 32% 11.1 GB/s	Latency 109 37% 109 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 52.8% Great: 142%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	10	8	144	24.5"	1280 720	GBT2401 AORUS FI25F

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X299X AORUS XTREME WF Builds (Compare 21 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 175%

UFO

Desktop 92%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 222%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X299X AORUS XTREME WF

CPU
Core i9-10980XEIntel $1,100Bench 84%, 4,959 samples	15x
Core i9-9980XEIntel $1,097Bench 83%, 2,201 samples	2x
Core i7-7800XIntel $216Bench 78%, 22,334 samples	1x

GPU
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,306Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	11x
Titan RTXNvidia $1,477Bench 168%, 2,418 samples	3x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	2x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $150Bench 336%, 200,600 samples	4x
970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $320Bench 327%, 38,669 samples	2x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	2x

RAM
8x8GBUnknownBench 94%, 4,255 samples	8x
8x16GBUnknownBench 104%, 2,632 samples	5x
4x16GBUnknownBench 98%, 9,153 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 53% - Above average

Total price: $2,556

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16