Intel H61

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	7.29% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	77.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (46%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Intel H61 (all builds)
Memory	6.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20201223
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 08 '21 at 14:17
Run Duration	140 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	46%

PC Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-3220-$79 71,790 User benchmarks, average bench 52% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	61% Good	Memory 83.6 1-Core 89.5 2-Core 174 68% 116 Pts	4-Core 224 8-Core 224 30% 224 Pts	64-Core 230 14% 230 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 61% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTS 250 14,881 User benchmarks, average bench 7% Device(0000 0000) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01 Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	7.29% Terrible	Lighting 10.4 Reflection 12.5 Parallax 3.3 8% 8.73 fps	MRender 8.1 Gravity 6.9 Splatting 4.2 5% 6.4 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 7.29% Great: 8%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Hs-ssd-c 100 120G 120GB 42 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 78GB free (System drive) Firmware: SN08 SusWrite @10s intervals: 346 371 102 101 96 101 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	77.7% Very good	Read 440 Write 329 Mixed 365 SusWrite 186 74% 330 MB/s	4K Read 34.3 4K Write 59.9 4K Mixed 34.7 128% 43 MB/s	DQ Read 139 DQ Write 278 DQ Mixed 174 142% 197 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 77.7% Great: 83%
Hitachi HCS5C1032CLA382 320GB 1,049 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 274GB free Firmware: JCFO SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 73 71 72 70 72 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	42.2% Average	Read 75.3 Write 72.7 Mixed 39.3 SusWrite 71.8 48% 64.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.7 112% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 42.2% Great: 44%
Generic External 750GB 122 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 319GB free, PID 3920 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 29 26 26 26 26 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	15.9% Very poor	Read 32.7 Write 27.6 Mixed 20.7 SusWrite 26.9 36% 27 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.6 80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 15.9% Great: 41%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5471-040.A00LF 1x8GB 2,012 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	28.5% Poor	MC Read 9.4 MC Write 8.7 MC Mixed 8.5 25% 8.87 GB/s	SC Read 9.4 SC Write 9.4 SC Mixed 9.3 27% 9.37 GB/s	Latency 74.1 54% 74.1 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 28.5% Great: 30%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H61 Builds (Compare 10,187 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel H61

CPU
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	1,966x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	998x
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	989x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	2,007x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,354x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	706x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	486x
256GB 256GBSSDBench 77%, 9,229 samples	267x
128GB 128GBSSDBench 65%, 7,332 samples	264x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	600x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	585x
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	242x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $87

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16