HP Compaq nx7400 (RH427ES#ABZ)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive39.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 90% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemHP Compaq nx7400 (RH427ES#ABZ)  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 30A2
Memory1.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 1 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colori, 1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20080827
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 07 '21 at 17:26
Run Duration255 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU3%
CPU Throttled 90%

 PC Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 T7600-$130
U10, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.35 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
31.3% Below average
Memory 55.7
1-Core 22.8
2-Core 43
29% 40.5 Pts
4-Core 42.8
8-Core 44.4
6% 43.6 Pts
64-Core 35.5
2% 35.5 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 38%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
195GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 116 111 111 114 116 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
39.8% Below average
Read 118
Write 102
Mixed 109
SusWrite 113
25% 111 MB/s
4K Read 18.4
4K Write 32.5
4K Mixed 23.7
76% 24.9 MB/s
DQ Read 102
DQ Write 96.6
DQ Mixed 98.1
74% 98.8 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 39.8%
Great: 128%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR2
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
11.3% Very poor
MC Read 4.7
MC Write 2.4
MC Mixed 3.1
10% 3.4 GB/s
SC Read 3.8
SC Write 3
SC Mixed 2.7
9% 3.17 GB/s
Latency 141
28% 141 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 11.3%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback