Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 23% Surfboard	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 20.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.99% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	31.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (99%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N4100 6,492 User benchmarks, average bench 33% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	20.8% Poor	Memory 26 1-Core 36.2 2-Core 61.1 24% 41.1 Pts	4-Core 86.2 8-Core 114 13% 99.8 Pts	64-Core 124 8% 124 Pts
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 20.8% Great: 41%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600 35,976 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Device(0000 0000) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	1.99% Terrible	Lighting 2.1 Reflection 0.7 Parallax 1.7 2% 1.5 fps	MRender 5.7 Gravity 4.8 Splatting 0.1 2% 3.53 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.99% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Teclast 256GB NS550-2242 256GB 255 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 166GB free (System drive) Firmware: S0424A0S SusWrite @10s intervals: 339 97 69 46 74 23 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	31.9% Below average	Read 344 Write 326 Mixed 21.1 SusWrite 108 44% 200 MB/s	4K Read 11.2 4K Write 9.8 4K Mixed 0.9 23% 7.3 MB/s	DQ Read 219 DQ Write 18.8 DQ Mixed 22.5 41% 86.9 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 31.9% Great: 78%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
ABCD 123456789012345678 4x2GB 5,869 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 4 of 8 slots used 8GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	21.2% Poor	MC Read 8.4 MC Write 8.3 MC Mixed 8.3 24% 8.33 GB/s	SC Read 1.9 SC Write 3.7 SC Mixed 3.1 8% 2.9 GB/s	Latency 279 14% 279 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 21.2% Great: 29%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 32%

Sail boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N4100IntelBench 33%, 6,492 samples	11x

GPU
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	11x

SSD
256GB NS550-2242 256GBTeclastBench 54%, 255 samples	9x
MZNLN128HCGR-000H1 128GBSamsungBench 71%, 1,750 samples	1x
860 EVO M.2 1TBSamsungBench 110%, 27,887 samples	1x

RAM
123456789012345678 4x2GBABCDBench 24%, 5,869 samples	11x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16