Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515DA_M515DA

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 39% Jet ski	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	2.19% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	123% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515DA_M515DA (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X515DA
Memory	2.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200908
Uptime	7.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 06 '21 at 15:56
Run Duration	261 Seconds
Run User	IND-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U 78,189 User benchmarks, average bench 48% FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	39.5% Below average	Memory 36.4 1-Core 67.2 2-Core 129 42% 77.5 Pts	4-Core 228 8-Core 412 38% 320 Pts	64-Core 418 26% 418 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 39.5% Great: 63%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics 115,953 User benchmarks, average bench 10% Asus(1043 1FBF) 2GB Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.10.44.05 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	2.19% Terrible	Lighting 2.7 Reflection 2.8 Parallax 3.7 2% 3.07 fps	MRender 3 Gravity 2.8 Splatting 2.3 2% 2.7 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 2.19% Great: 13%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Pcie SSD 240GB 265 User benchmarks, average bench 149% 161GB free (System drive) Firmware: EDFM00.7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 777 764 244 250 260 259 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	123% Outstanding	Read 822 Write 878 Mixed 812 SusWrite 426 165% 734 MB/s	4K Read 31 4K Write 71.2 4K Mixed 48.1 146% 50.1 MB/s	DQ Read 501 DQ Write 301 DQ Mixed 433 314% 412 MB/s
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 123% Great: 205%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB 179,769 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 904GB free Firmware: JU0C2J SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 102 103 103 101 102 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	72% Very good	Read 147 Write 137 Mixed 56.6 SusWrite 103 81% 111 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 6.3 4K Mixed 0.6 238% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 72% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA851S6CJR6N-XN HMA851S6DJR6N-XN 8GB 354 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 3200, 3200 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	26.5% Poor	MC Read 7.4 MC Write 7.4 MC Mixed 13.6 27% 9.47 GB/s	SC Read 3.9 SC Write 8 SC Mixed 12.2 23% 8.03 GB/s	Latency 220 18% 220 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 26.5% Great: 84%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 11: 0R 2G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
11%	23%	31	174	133	60	15.5"	1536 864	BOE0903

History: Score 11: 1R 1G 3B | Score 11: 0R 2G 5B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515DA_M515DA Builds (Compare 163 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 54%

Yacht

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515DA_M515DA

CPU
Ryzen 5 3500UAMDBench 48%, 78,189 samples	93x
Ryzen 7 3700UAMDBench 49%, 23,686 samples	70x

GPU
Radeon Vega 8 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 115,953 samples	93x
Radeon RX Vega 10 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 37,264 samples	70x

SSD
OM8PCP3512F-AB 512GBKingstonBench 114%, 17,430 samples	65x
PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-256G-1002 256GBWDCBench 134%, 10,140 samples	33x
OM8PCP3512F-AB1 512GBKingstonBench 128%, 190 samples	29x

RAM
4ATF51264HZ-3G2J1 Samsung M471A5244CB0-CWE 8GBMicronBench 67%, 2,461 samples	41x
Hynix HMA81GS6DJR8N-XN 16GBUnknownBench 71%, 586 samples	30x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	29x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16