Asus N55SF

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 52% Yacht	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	1.85% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	31.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Asus N55SF (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK N55SF
Memory	1.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20110829
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Sep 06 '21 at 14:22
Run Duration	130 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2430M-$53 41,461 User benchmarks, average bench 50% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	53.7% Above average	Memory 82.5 1-Core 72 2-Core 109 56% 87.7 Pts	4-Core 148 8-Core 147 20% 148 Pts	64-Core 181 11% 181 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 53.7% Great: 59%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Asus(1043 2050) 1.8GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229 Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	1.85% Terrible	Lighting 2 Reflection 1.7 Parallax 1.5 2% 1.73 fps	MRender 2.2 Gravity 2.4 Splatting 3.4 2% 2.67 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.85% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 120GB-$15 37,154 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 13GB free (System drive) Firmware: M6CR013 SusWrite @10s intervals: 273 45 13 33 27 6 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	31.9% Below average	Read 374 Write 111 Mixed 7.5 SusWrite 66.1 30% 140 MB/s	4K Read 13.2 4K Write 23.4 4K Mixed 0.7 33% 12.4 MB/s	DQ Read 84.4 DQ Write 95.4 DQ Mixed 0.2 25% 60 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 31.9% Great: 86%
Samsung UHD Video Pack 500GB 111 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 396GB free, PID 62c8 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 72 72 71 71 72 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	31.2% Below average	Read 73 Write 52.5 Mixed 46.8 SusWrite 71.5 81% 61 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 31.2% Great: 45%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston ASU1333S9-4G-ECEWG 1x4GB 555 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 1 of 4 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	26.1% Poor	MC Read 8.9 MC Write 8.3 MC Mixed 7.9 24% 8.37 GB/s	SC Read 6.7 SC Write 6.8 SC Mixed 7.1 20% 6.87 GB/s	Latency 76.1 53% 76.1 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 26.1% Great: 29%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical N55SF Builds (Compare 197 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 53%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

System: Asus N55SF

CPU
Core i7-2670QMIntel $200Bench 56%, 51,169 samples	114x
Core i7-2630QMIntel $199Bench 55%, 39,605 samples	31x
Core i5-2430MIntel $53Bench 50%, 41,461 samples	28x

GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	121x
GeForce GT 555MNvidiaBench 4%, 4,170 samples	72x
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	4x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	6x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	5x
Ultra II 960GBSanDisk $226Bench 85%, 35,454 samples	5x

RAM
HMT351S6BFR8C-H9 2x4GBHynixBench 40%, 8,137 samples	34x
M471B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 43%, 15,815 samples	24x
M471B5273DH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 25%, 18,713 samples	9x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 46% - Average

Total price: $300

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16