Asus ZenBook Q536FD_Q536FD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (90th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 10 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics20.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive376% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 90% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAsus ZenBook Q536FD_Q536FD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Q536FD
Memory9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190531
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 06 '21 at 05:53
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%
CPU Throttled 90%

 PC Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8565U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
82.2% Excellent
Memory 74.9
1-Core 142
2-Core 283
89% 167 Pts
4-Core 488
8-Core 655
72% 572 Pts
64-Core 634
39% 634 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design
Asus(1043 1B5E) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.6231
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
20.5% Poor
Lighting 24.4
Reflection 35.8
Parallax 26.3
20% 28.8 fps
MRender 33.6
Gravity 28.7
Splatting 20.2
22% 27.5 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 20.5%
Great: 23%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$93
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1693 910 910 919 979 970 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
376% Outstanding
Read 2,712
Write 2203
Mixed 2,178
SusWrite 1,063
456% 2,039 MB/s
4K Read 120
4K Write 210
4K Mixed 146
480% 158 MB/s
DQ Read 1,424
DQ Write 971
DQ Mixed 1,067
832% 1,154 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 376%
Great: 410%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$137
1.5TB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 8,551
Write 7,212
Mixed 7,320
1,714% 7,694 MB/s
4K Read 760
4K Write 409
4K Mixed 368
1,840% 512 MB/s
DQ Read 1,743
DQ Write 1,301
DQ Mixed 1,334
1,048% 1,459 MB/s
Poor: 81% Great: 133%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K44BM0-CRC 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
79.5% Very good
MC Read 31.1
MC Write 31
MC Mixed 22.6
81% 28.2 GB/s
SC Read 20
SC Write 33
SC Mixed 26
75% 26.3 GB/s
Latency 90.6
44% 90.6 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 79.5%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 23: 2R 3G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
23% 6% 141 302 196 60 15.5" 1536 864 BOE07D9
Typical ZenBook Q536FD_Q536FD Builds (Compare 134 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Asus ZenBook Q536FD_Q536FD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-13600K $232Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $378WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback