Toshiba Satellite Radius P55W-B

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	4.48% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	112% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Toshiba Satellite Radius P55W-B (all builds)
Motherboard	Type2 Type2 - Board Product Name1
Memory	5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20141203
Uptime	3.8 Days
Run Date	Sep 05 '21 at 23:25
Run Duration	164 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5500U 73,655 User benchmarks, average bench 46% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	61.1% Good	Memory 79.2 1-Core 97.8 2-Core 171 68% 116 Pts	4-Core 250 8-Core 249 34% 250 Pts	64-Core 253 16% 253 Pts
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 61.1% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz) 231,498 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Toshiba(1179 F96A) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5126 Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	4.48% Terrible	Lighting 4.9 Reflection 2.9 Parallax 6.8 4% 4.87 fps	MRender 6.7 Gravity 5.3 Splatting 7.5 5% 6.5 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.48% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TB 74,123 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 842GB free (System drive) Firmware: 401020WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 333 326 437 416 466 467 MB/s Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	112% Outstanding	Read 492 Write 455 Mixed 397 SusWrite 408 98% 438 MB/s	4K Read 37.6 4K Write 88.2 4K Mixed 48.2 165% 58 MB/s	DQ Read 384 DQ Write 324 DQ Mixed 252 217% 320 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 112% Great: 117%
Jmicron Tech 128GB 197 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 118GB free Firmware: 3101 SusWrite @10s intervals: 198 221 226 225 231 231 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	63.7% Good	Read 362 Write 224 Mixed 217 SusWrite 222 57% 256 MB/s	4K Read 27.5 4K Write 38.5 4K Mixed 25.1 94% 30.4 MB/s	DQ Read 166 DQ Write 142 DQ Mixed 48.1 65% 119 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 63.7% Great: 73%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston TSB16D3LS1KFG/4G 2x4GB 372 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	54% Above average	MC Read 18.6 MC Write 21.2 MC Mixed 16.6 54% 18.8 GB/s	SC Read 16 SC Write 16.6 SC Mixed 17.7 48% 16.8 GB/s	Latency 81.9 49% 81.9 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 54% Great: 56%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	9	7	60	15.6"	1280 720	LGD044D

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Satellite Radius P55W-B Builds (Compare 87 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite Radius P55W-B

CPU
Core i7-4510UIntelBench 47%, 63,054 samples	39x
Core i7-5500UIntelBench 46%, 73,655 samples	29x
Core i5-4210UIntelBench 41%, 82,966 samples	14x

GPU
HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 275,372 samples	52x
HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)IntelBench 4%, 231,498 samples	34x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	1x

SSD
MZMTE256HMHP-00000 256GBSamsungBench 70%, 488 samples	12x
SU630 240GBAdataBench 64%, 60,212 samples	5x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	4x

RAM
M471B5173QH0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 48%, 30,873 samples	17x
TSB16D3LS1KFG/4G 2x4GBKingstonBench 48%, 372 samples	13x
HMT451S6AFR8A-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 48%, 18,159 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16