| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master! |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 12.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Boot Drive | 72.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
| System | Dell Precision M6700 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Dell 0JWMFY |
| Memory | 14.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20170509 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Aug 10 '17 at 14:19 |
| Run Duration | 114 Seconds |
| Run User | ROU-User |
| Background CPU | 0% |
PC Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
63%
Good
|
72% 123 Pts
|
32% 244 Pts
|
15% 245 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia Quadro K4000M
Dell(1028 053F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 601 MHz, MLim: 700 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 377.11
|
12.7%
Very poor
|
12% 15.1 fps
|
14% 17.2 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
72.9%
Very good
|
91% 410 MB/s
|
75% 25.4 MB/s
|
95% 177 MB/s
|
|
|
52.7%
Above average
|
69% 314 MB/s
|
52% 15.3 MB/s
|
50% 81.3 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M471B1G73BH0-CK0 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
59.1%
Above average
|
59% 20.6 GB/s
|
52% 18.1 GB/s
|
55% 72.8 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Precision M6700 Builds (Compare 400 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Dell Precision M6700
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-3740QMIntel $220Bench 64%, 14,369 samples | 125x |
| Core i7-3840QMIntel $549Bench 66%, 3,981 samples | 89x |
| Core i7-3940XMIntel $344Bench 70%, 2,187 samples | 65x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples | 127x |
| Quadro K4000MNvidiaBench 12%, 631 samples | 80x |
| Quadro K3000MNvidiaBench 8%, 2,310 samples | 72x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 69% - Good | Total price: $220 |