HP 810-209

Performance Results


Gaming 57% Gunboat	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 48% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	80.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	64.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (55%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP 810-209 (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 2AF3
Memory	13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20141024
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 05 '21 at 17:19
Run Duration	160 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	55%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4770K-$120 172,887 User benchmarks, average bench 74% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	69.7% Good	Memory 74.7 1-Core 107 2-Core 192 71% 124 Pts	4-Core 349 8-Core 509 54% 429 Pts	64-Core 561 35% 561 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 69.7% Great: 84%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% EVGA(3842 5173) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.11 Performing below potential (58^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	80.2% Excellent	Lighting 99.1 Reflection 112 Parallax 100 81% 104 fps	MRender 94.6 Gravity 98.9 Splatting 96.5 79% 96.7 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 80.2% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 429GB free (System drive) Firmware: 4B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 229 244 256 264 263 266 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	64.9% Good	Read 363 Write 284 Mixed 242 SusWrite 254 64% 286 MB/s	4K Read 13.3 4K Write 54 4K Mixed 15.3 68% 27.5 MB/s	DQ Read 352 DQ Write 296 DQ Mixed 230 198% 292 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 64.9% Great: 129%
JetFlash Transcend 8GB 9,769 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 3GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.2 7.6 7.6 7.7 7.6 7.6 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	5.08% Terrible	Read 18.2 Write 7.2 Mixed 4.2 SusWrite 7.4 11% 9.25 MB/s	4K Read 3.5 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 13% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.08% Great: 16%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Sniper DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GB 2,474 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (34^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	48.5% Average	MC Read 17.3 MC Write 17.9 MC Mixed 15.4 48% 16.9 GB/s	SC Read 12.5 SC Write 17.5 SC Mixed 15.2 43% 15.1 GB/s	Latency 90.9 44% 90.9 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 48.5% Great: 62%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	8	6	60	31.5"	1280 720	AUS32E0 ASUS VG32VQ1B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 810-209 Builds (Compare 32 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 18%

Surfboard

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

System: HP 810-209

CPU
Core i7-4770KIntel $120Bench 74%, 172,887 samples	32x

GPU
GTX 760 (192-bit)NvidiaBench 20%, 10,656 samples	8x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	6x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	3x

SSD
MZ7PD128HCFV-000H1 128GBSamsungBench 83%, 3,024 samples	5x
MZ7PD128HAFV-000 128GBSamsungBench 81%, 1,744 samples	4x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	3x

RAM
16JTF1G64AZ-1G6E1 Samsung M378B5173DB0-CK0 12GBMicronBench 43%, 122 samples	3x
M378B1G73QH0-CK0 Hynix HMT451U6BFR8A-PB 12GBSamsungBench 43%, 95 samples	3x
HP698651-154-KEF Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 12GBKingstonBench 39%, 7 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 93% - Outstanding

Total price: $120

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16