Extra exone

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 80%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics83.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemExtra exone  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING
Memory27.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191113
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 05 '21 at 16:02
Run Duration237 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$205
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
92.1% Outstanding
Memory 75.2
1-Core 147
2-Core 300
92% 174 Pts
4-Core 584
8-Core 1,037
98% 811 Pts
64-Core 1,426
88% 1,426 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 92.1%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega-64-$400
CLim: 1630 MHz, MLim: 945 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.8.2
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
83.4% Excellent
Lighting 106
Reflection 110
Parallax 169
87% 128 fps
MRender 90.8
Gravity 121
Splatting 76.6
77% 96.2 fps
Poor: 77%
This bench: 83.4%
Great: 94%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170
72GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2713
Write 2,013
Mixed 1,433
454% 2,053 MB/s
4K Read 59.5
4K Write 172
4K Mixed 81.4
286% 104 MB/s
DQ Read 1,222
DQ Write 1,014
DQ Mixed 1,111
834% 1,116 MB/s
Poor: 195% Great: 393%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
257GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 490 490 486 495 489 489 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
135% Outstanding
Read 514
Write 489
Mixed 448
SusWrite 490
109% 485 MB/s
4K Read 47.7
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 65.7
218% 76.5 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 359
DQ Mixed 369
278% 371 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 135%
Great: 133%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$50
856GB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 146 150 152 151 150 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
89.9% Excellent
Read 164
Write 171
Mixed 40.2
SusWrite 150
95% 131 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.5
140% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 89.9%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFS8266.M8FD 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
78.2% Very good
MC Read 32.1
MC Write 20.1
MC Mixed 31.6
80% 27.9 GB/s
SC Read 24.6
SC Write 20.1
SC Mixed 30.2
71% 25 GB/s
Latency 90
44% 90 ns
Poor: 76%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 118%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 19: 3R 1G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
19% 31% 16 108 5 100 34" 2752 1152 AOC3402 U34G2G4R3
Typical exone Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 79%
Battleship

System: Extra exone

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $735
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback