PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 116% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | 89.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus SABERTOOTH X79 (all builds) |
Memory | 10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20131015 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Sep 05 '21 at 04:30 |
Run Duration | 206 Seconds |
Run User | AUS-User |
Background CPU | 20% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
63.2%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.96
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
116%
Outstanding
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
WDC WD8001FZBX-00ASYA0 8TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 140 163 170 166 173 MB/s
|
19.1%
Very poor
|
|||
SanDisk Extreme Pro 240GB-$79
55GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X21200RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 234 221 349 367 359 388 MB/s
|
89.8%
Excellent
|
|||
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89
161GB free
Firmware: 0C3K87RA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 231 163 118 100 88 91 MB/s
|
53%
Above average
|
|||
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
30GB free
Firmware: EXT0CB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 106 140 145 139 144 MB/s
|
53.4%
Above average
|
|||
WD Black 4TB (2013)-$178
444GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 131 144 150 143 151 MB/s
|
80.2%
Excellent
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GB
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
|
45.2%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 8 | 6 | 60 | 27" | 1280 720 | GSM58C9 E2742 |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-3930KIntel $280Bench 74%, 33,172 samples | 434x |
Core i7-3820IntelBench 70%, 38,674 samples | 383x |
Core i7-4820KIntel $110Bench 72%, 23,169 samples | 296x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 104x |
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 104x |
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 100x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 76% - Very good | Total price: $812 |