Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive	86% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8300H 167,898 User benchmarks, average bench 65% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	80.3% Excellent	Memory 84.4 1-Core 124 2-Core 206 80% 138 Pts	4-Core 415 8-Core 573 62% 494 Pts	64-Core 593 37% 593 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 80.3% Great: 80%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk SD9SB8W512G1101 512GB 730 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 110GB free (System drive) Firmware: X6106001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 316 301 322 283 247 316 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	86% Excellent	Read 420 Write 404 Mixed 262 SusWrite 298 78% 346 MB/s	4K Read 29.4 4K Write 64 4K Mixed 34.2 122% 42.5 MB/s	DQ Read 350 DQ Write 250 DQ Mixed 265 208% 288 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 86% Great: 105%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Ramaxel RMSA3260MD78HAF-2666 1x8GB 6,442 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	44.2% Average	MC Read 16.7 MC Write 15.8 MC Mixed 11.7 42% 14.7 GB/s	SC Read 13.2 SC Write 16.3 SC Mixed 13.5 41% 14.3 GB/s	Latency 72.7 55% 72.7 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 44.2% Great: 46%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
15%	13%	38	99	4	144	0"	1536 864

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 65%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i7-8750HIntelBench 70%, 442,631 samples	2,156x
Core i5-8300HIntelBench 65%, 167,898 samples	1,906x

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	2,087x
GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 29%, 105,856 samples	1,057x
GTX 1050 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 23%, 160,694 samples	918x

SSD
RPFTJ128PDD2EWX 128GBBench 68%, 9,061 samples	386x
TOSHIBA 128GBKbg30zmt128gBench 83%, 5,624 samples	264x
MZVLB256HAHQ-000L2 256GBSamsungBench 180%, 5,016 samples	182x

RAM
RMSA3260MD78HAF-2666 1x8GBRamaxelBench 39%, 6,442 samples	579x
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 96,646 samples	409x
M471A2K43CB1-CTD 1x16GBSamsungBench 44%, 44,819 samples	295x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16