Asus P8H61-M LE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.29% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8H61-M LE  (all builds)
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110303
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateSep 04 '21 at 06:50
Run Duration233 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$250
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
73.8% Very good
Memory 90.9
1-Core 88.6
2-Core 172
70% 117 Pts
4-Core 328
8-Core 338
44% 333 Pts
64-Core 339
21% 339 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Asus(1043 84FC) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
4.29% Terrible
Lighting 4.8
Reflection 6.4
Parallax 6.2
4% 5.8 fps
MRender 4
Gravity 7.1
Splatting 6.9
5% 6 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.29%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 240GB-$20
160GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900613
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 149 138 62 67 48 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
38.6% Below average
Read 214
Write 142
Mixed 150
SusWrite 103
34% 152 MB/s
4K Read 22.3
4K Write 29.8
4K Mixed 18.7
74% 23.6 MB/s
DQ Read 22.2
DQ Write 36.3
DQ Mixed 14.3
15% 24.3 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 91%
Toshiba MQ01ACF050 500GB-$150
299GB free
Firmware: AV0A1C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 113 114 111 114 114 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
64.5% Good
Read 112
Write 113
Mixed 50.8
SusWrite 113
71% 97.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
166% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 69%
ST500LT0 12-9WS142 500GB
219GB free, PID 0711
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 25 25 25 25 25 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
13% Very poor
Read 27.7
Write 22
Mixed 19.8
SusWrite 25.2
32% 23.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
63% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5474-038.A00LF 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
49.2% Average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 17.4
MC Mixed 15.1
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 13.9
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 65.9
61% 65.9 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 56: 6R 7G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
56% 16% 112 165 125 60 18.5" 1360 768 SAM04DF SyncMaster
History: Score 32: 2R 6G 4B | Score 56: 6R 7G 5B
Typical P8H61-M LE Builds (Compare 1,012 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H61-M LE - $134

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $211
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback