PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 53.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 49.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-Z68X-UD3-B3 (all builds) |
Memory | 9.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20120321 |
Uptime | 4.1 Days |
Run Date | Sep 04 '21 at 00:55 |
Run Duration | 191 Seconds |
Run User | BRA-User |
Background CPU | 2% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
Socket 1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 5.2 GHz (avg)
|
78.1%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD RX 580-$130
PowerColor(148C 2377) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1411 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.8.1
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
53.4%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
SanDisk Ultra Plus 128GB-$75
20GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X2316RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 76 68 75 71 71 MB/s
|
49.6%
Average
|
|||
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
173GB free
Firmware: SBFKB1C2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 271 174 206 279 189 264 MB/s
|
35.2%
Below average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
346GB free
Firmware: SC48
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 83 68 75 74 72 MB/s
|
54.8%
Above average
|
|||
Samsung HD502IJ 500GB-$40
259GB free
Firmware: 1AA01110
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 53 52 48 49 49 MB/s
|
38.8%
Below average
|
|||
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 32GB
20GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.3 8.4 7.9 8 8.4 7.8 MB/s
|
10.4%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
51.7%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 11 | 9 | 60 | 34.1" | 1280 720 | GSM5AFB LG ULTRAWIDE |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples | 67x |
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples | 54x |
Core i7-2600Intel $197Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 19x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 21x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 17x |
GTX 1660Nvidia $143Bench 68%, 230,793 samples | 12x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 68% - Good | Total price: $463 |