Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	6.19% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	53.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	192GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 192GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5690 2,873 User benchmarks, average bench 72% CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.45 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	74.1% Very good	Memory 83.7 1-Core 87.7 2-Core 175 68% 116 Pts	4-Core 346 8-Core 716 62% 531 Pts	64-Core 1,051 65% 1,051 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 74.1% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTS 240 1,075 User benchmarks, average bench 7% Nvidia(10DE 0736) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01 Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	6.19% Terrible	Lighting 8.4 Reflection 5.4 Parallax 3.1 7% 5.63 fps	MRender 7.8 Gravity 7.2 Splatting 3.9 5% 6.3 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 6.19% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 282GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 213 218 217 209 214 214 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	53.9% Above average	Read 224 Write 195 Mixed 177 SusWrite 214 46% 202 MB/s	4K Read 17.5 4K Write 39.3 4K Mixed 21.9 75% 26.2 MB/s	DQ Read 199 DQ Write 182 DQ Mixed 168 132% 183 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 53.9% Great: 129%
WD WD400BD-22JMC0 40GB 1,139 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 24GB free Firmware: 10.01E04 SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 54 54 53 54 54 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	30.6% Below average	Read 53.4 Write 53.7 Mixed 34.1 SusWrite 53.2 36% 48.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.7 119% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 30.6% Great: 33%
Samsung HD161HJ 160GB-$40 22,667 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 91GB free Firmware: JF100-19 SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 71 70 70 71 71 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	40.3% Average	Read 69.9 Write 71.3 Mixed 45.9 SusWrite 70.5 47% 64.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.6 112% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 40.3% Great: 42%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:80 CE M393B2G70BH0-CK0 ID:80 CE M393B2G70BH0-CK0 ID:80 CE M393B2G70BH0-CK0 ID:80 CE M393B2G70BH0-CK0 ID:80 CE M393B2G70BH0-CK0 ID:80 CE M393B2G70BH0-CK0 ID:80 CE M393B2G70BH0-CK0 ID:80 CE M... 226GB 16 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 34816 MB Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	48.9% Average	MC Read 20.7 MC Write 16.4 MC Mixed 18.3 53% 18.5 GB/s	SC Read 8.1 SC Write 6.6 SC Mixed 5.9 20% 6.87 GB/s	Latency 73.9 54% 73.9 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 48.9% Great: 49%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon X56501stBench 64%, 7,756 samples	318x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56751stBench 68%, 4,275 samples	188x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56701stBench 67%, 4,676 samples	179x

SSD
WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TBWDCBench 98%, 74,123 samples	38x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	34x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	34x

RAM
ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 58GBUnknownBench 50%, 261 samples	23x
ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 JE... 82GBUnknownBench 53%, 67 samples	19x
ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD H... 130GBUnknownBench 53%, 67 samples	15x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16