Asrock Z170M Pro4S

Performance Results


Gaming 116% UFO	Desktop 92% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 98% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	135% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	220% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock Z170M Pro4S (all builds)
Memory	13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20161213
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Aug 10 '17 at 00:02
Run Duration	212 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	11%

PC Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700-$180 282,363 User benchmarks, average bench 72% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	85.1% Excellent	Memory 92.6 1-Core 118 2-Core 236 84% 149 Pts	4-Core 418 8-Core 645 66% 532 Pts	64-Core 644 40% 644 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 85.1% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Asus(1043 85EA); ASUS ROG GTX 1080 Ti Strix OC Gaming 11G CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 384.94 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	135% Outstanding	Lighting 191 Reflection 210 Parallax 185 156% 195 fps	MRender 133 Gravity 184 Splatting 132 121% 149 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 135% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85 104,444 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 477GB free Firmware: EXT0BB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 9610 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1740 (B1) Unknown 84 84 192 (B3) Unknown 100 1 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 66 51 34 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 3 (EB) Unknown 99 99 211 (F1) Unknown 99 99 41113345620	96.8% Outstanding	Read 486 Write 365 Mixed 344 88% 398 MB/s	4K Read 43.7 4K Write 79.4 4K Mixed 41.9 162% 55 MB/s	DQ Read 41.5 DQ Write 209 DQ Mixed 107 88% 119 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 96.8% Great: 108%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 477GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 589 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 183 (B1) Unknown 99 99 1 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 65 56 35 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 10 (F1) Unknown 99 99 1288979706
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 240,629 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 193GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	220% Outstanding	Read 2,439 Write 931 Mixed 1,207 334% 1,526 MB/s	4K Read 58.3 4K Write 138 4K Mixed 27.4 196% 74.4 MB/s	DQ Read 50.9 DQ Write 371 DQ Mixed 168 142% 197 MB/s
Poor: 142% ↑ This bench: 220% Great: 236%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$80 75,644 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 1.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 179 178 6041 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 120 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 587 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 115 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 12 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 170 170 92601 (C2) HDA temperature 119 116 31 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	80.6% Excellent	Read 149 Write 132 Mixed 128 102% 136 MB/s	4K Read 0.69 4K Write 2.17 4K Mixed 0.19 90% 1.02 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 80.6% Great: 96%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 921GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 142 142 69 (03) Spinup time 124 124 12896960697 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 953 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 113 113 35 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 4706 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 710 (C0) Power-off retract count 97 97 4780 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 97 97 4780 (C2) HDA temperature 171 171 176094642211 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	107% Outstanding	Read 188 Write 186 Mixed 153 131% 175 MB/s	4K Read 0.78 4K Write 2.12 4K Mixed 0.2 94% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 107%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64 143,477 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 807GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 142 140 3883 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2678 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 87 87 9591 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1635 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 84 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 133 133 203672 (C2) HDA temperature 112 102 31 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	76.7% Very good	Read 137 Write 130 Mixed 123 98% 130 MB/s	4K Read 0.81 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.21 101% 1.14 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 76.7% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB-$125 59,072 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	75.9% Very good	MC Read 27.9 MC Write 28.5 MC Mixed 23.1 76% 26.5 GB/s	SC Read 17.9 SC Write 29.9 SC Mixed 24.2 68% 24 GB/s	Latency 62.9 64% 62.9 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 75.9% Great: 85%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z170M Pro4S Builds (Compare 325 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 47%

Yacht

Desktop 83%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 38%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock Z170M Pro4S - $130

CPU
Core i5-6600KIntel $81Bench 72%, 342,244 samples	97x
Core i7-6700KIntel $180Bench 81%, 588,978 samples	67x
Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	51x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	39x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	23x
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	20x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	17x
850 EVO M.2 250GBSamsungBench 102%, 28,058 samples	10x
BX100 250GBCrucial $141Bench 87%, 42,930 samples	8x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	13x
Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GBHyperX $125Bench 73%, 59,072 samples	12x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GBCorsair $46Bench 69%, 47,721 samples	12x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 88% - Excellent

Total price: $467

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16