Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA

Performance Results


Gaming 95% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 78% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	128% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	98.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA (all builds)
Memory	29.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170607
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 03 '21 at 06:44
Run Duration	196 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8350-$130 313,196 User benchmarks, average bench 61% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.6 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	74.9% Very good	Memory 89.1 1-Core 82.7 2-Core 165 67% 112 Pts	4-Core 328 8-Core 494 51% 411 Pts	64-Core 504 31% 504 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 74.9% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% EVGA(3842 6390) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2769 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 471.96 Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	128% Outstanding	Lighting 176 Reflection 194 Parallax 199 143% 190 fps	MRender 136 Gravity 181 Splatting 128 120% 149 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 128% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 92GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 280 303 245 277 271 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	98.2% Outstanding	Read 503 Write 459 Mixed 420 SusWrite 255 92% 409 MB/s	4K Read 41.3 4K Write 83.8 4K Mixed 53.8 176% 59.6 MB/s	DQ Read 286 DQ Write 46.4 DQ Mixed 60.6 71% 131 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 98.2% Great: 128%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 75GB free Firmware: SBFKJ4.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 300 381 380 273 214 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	62% Good	Read 408 Write 227 Mixed 259 SusWrite 286 66% 295 MB/s	4K Read 28.3 4K Write 21.3 4K Mixed 21 81% 23.5 MB/s	DQ Read 135 DQ Write 20.9 DQ Mixed 34.7 36% 63.6 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 62% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 4x8GB 3,072 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	55.3% Above average	MC Read 22.8 MC Write 17.4 MC Mixed 20.1 57% 20.1 GB/s	SC Read 12.1 SC Write 9.4 SC Mixed 14.3 34% 11.9 GB/s	Latency 68.4 58% 68.4 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 55.3% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 4: 0R 1G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
4%	5%	43	116	7	60	72.3"	1920 1080	GSM0001 LG TV

History: Score 6: 0R 1G 3B | Score 4: 0R 1G 1B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 970 PRO GAMING/AURA Builds (Compare 901 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA - $299

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	431x
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	112x
FX-8370AMD $175Bench 62%, 34,720 samples	85x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	86x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	66x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	51x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	22x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	18x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	18x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	51x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x8GBKingstonBench 63%, 12,722 samples	13x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $588

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16