Asus M5A78L-M/USB3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics22.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive41.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus M5A78L-M/USB3  (all builds)
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141202
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 03 '21 at 03:49
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8300-$168
AM3R2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
69.6% Good
Memory 92.6
1-Core 73.8
2-Core 134
63% 100 Pts
4-Core 253
8-Core 457
43% 355 Pts
64-Core 460
28% 460 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 260X-$120
Gigabyte(1458 228B) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 26.20.13031.20012
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
22.1% Poor
Lighting 27.3
Reflection 28.3
Parallax 39.8
22% 31.8 fps
MRender 25.1
Gravity 28
Splatting 26.8
22% 26.6 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 22.1%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89
0GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3J96R9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 200 155 117 93 89 86 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
41.2% Average
Read 237
Write 220
Mixed 38.5
SusWrite 124
34% 155 MB/s
4K Read 21.5
4K Write 46.4
4K Mixed 5
64% 24.3 MB/s
DQ Read 154
DQ Write 141
DQ Mixed 97.7
87% 131 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 88%
Toshiba MK5065GSX 500GB-$52
0GB free
Firmware: GJ003A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 47 49 48 49 49 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
30.8% Below average
Read 58.7
Write 50.7
Mixed 22.1
SusWrite 48.3
33% 45 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
104% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 42%
WD WD10JPCX-24UE4T0 1TB
0GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 85.7
Mixed 53.5
53% 69.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 20% Great: 61%
Flash USB Disk 4GB
0GB free, PID ab43
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3 3.5 3.3 3.5 3.3 3.6 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
3.53% Terrible
Read 13.5
Write 2.2
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 3.3
6% 5.8 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
13% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.53%
Great: 4%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16GB
null MHz
8192, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
31.4% Below average
MC Read 12.3
MC Write 9.8
MC Mixed 7.2
28% 9.77 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 9.9
28% 9.73 GB/s
Latency 63
64% 63 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 60 31.5" 1280 720 PHL0000 PHILIPS FTV
Typical M5A78L-M/USB3 Builds (Compare 1,858 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M5A78L-M/USB3 - $53

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $128
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback