MSI X470 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B79)

Performance Results


Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 41% Speed boat	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	30.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	133% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Micro-Star MS-7B79
Motherboard	MSI X470 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B79) (all builds)
Memory	8.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210518
Uptime	1.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 02 '21 at 21:31
Run Duration	258 Seconds
Run User	ZAF-User
Background CPU	3%

Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G-$119 14,368 User benchmarks, average bench 86% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 0.9 GHz (avg) Relative performance (0^th percentile)	27.6% Poor	Memory 44.1 1-Core 13.1 2-Core 26.3 21% 27.8 Pts	4-Core 66.6 8-Core 61.6 9% 64.1 Pts	64-Core 70.6 4% 70.6 Pts
Poor: 84% ↑ This bench: 27.6% Great: 99%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Gigabyte(1458 22F1) CLim: 1365 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.8.2 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	30.5% Below average	Lighting 26.8 Reflection 33.9 Parallax 81.8 22% 47.5 fps	MRender 62.9 Gravity 69.9 Splatting 45.7 47% 59.5 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 30.5% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kimtigo 512GB 512GB 323 User benchmarks, average bench 153% 426GB free (System drive) Firmware: T1202A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 774 885 894 880 1045 1065 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	133% Outstanding	Read 1,196 Write 1,085 Mixed 861 SusWrite 924 228% 1,016 MB/s	4K Read 18.6 4K Write 33.8 4K Mixed 13.8 64% 22.1 MB/s	DQ Read 226 DQ Write 225 DQ Mixed 196 155% 216 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 133% Great: 275%
Transcend TS512GMTS430S 512GB 550 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 427GB free Firmware: 02J0S7JA SusWrite @10s intervals: 334 308 218 219 221 219 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	72.2% Very good	Read 380 Write 354 Mixed 346 SusWrite 253 75% 333 MB/s	4K Read 27.9 4K Write 43.4 4K Mixed 33.4 108% 34.9 MB/s	DQ Read 210 DQ Write 138 DQ Mixed 101 95% 150 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 72.2% Great: 105%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 519GB free Firmware: CC46 SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 184 184 185 184 185 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	106% Outstanding	Read 186 Write 173 Mixed 80.2 SusWrite 184 114% 156 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.8 136% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 114%
Seagate ST4000NM0033-9ZM170 4TB 3,748 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 449GB free Firmware: SN04 SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 105 105 105 105 105 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	72.7% Very good	Read 149 Write 146 Mixed 86.2 SusWrite 104 89% 121 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.8 177% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 72.7% Great: 105%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata DDR4 3000 2OZ 2x8GB 25,457 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	32.9% Below average	MC Read 11.3 MC Write 7.9 MC Mixed 15.9 33% 11.7 GB/s	SC Read 9.3 SC Write 11.3 SC Mixed 10.6 30% 10.4 GB/s	Latency 184 22% 184 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 32.9% Great: 106%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	3	30	2	60	27"	1920 1080	DEL41F8 DELL S2721HN

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X470 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B79) Builds (Compare 4,906 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 86%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 81%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: MSI X470 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B79)

CPU
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $83Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	1,392x
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	683x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $152Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	328x

GPU
RTX 3060Nvidia $279Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	283x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	280x
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	272x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	131x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $94Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	121x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	121x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	366x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	155x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	146x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $487

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

MSI X470 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B79)

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: MSI X470 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B79)

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)