Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 12% Tree trunk	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.3% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo T5250-$90 962 User benchmarks, average bench 31% uPGA-478, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	28.2% Poor	Memory 52.6 1-Core 13.6 2-Core 28.1 24% 31.4 Pts	4-Core 24.3 8-Core 27.5 3% 25.9 Pts	64-Core 32.1 2% 32.1 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 28.2% Great: 36%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 8400M G 305 User benchmarks, average bench 0% Acer(1025 011E) 128MB Ram: 128MB, Driver: 341.92 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.3% Terrible	Lighting 0.2 Reflection 0.3 Parallax 0 0% 0.17 fps	MRender 1.2 Gravity 0.8 Splatting 0.3 1% 0.77 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.3% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Seagate ST98823AS 80GB-$121 641 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 43GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3.06 SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 12 20 29 32 31 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	15.9% Very poor	Read 31 Write 27 Mixed 5.8 SusWrite 24.3 16% 22 MB/s	4K Read 0 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.5 63% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 15.9% Great: 21%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x1GB 68,489 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 2 of 2 slots used 2GB DIMM DDR2 Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	11% Very poor	MC Read 4.3 MC Write 2.9 MC Mixed 3 10% 3.4 GB/s	SC Read 2.9 SC Write 2.4 SC Mixed 3.3 8% 2.87 GB/s	Latency 151 26% 151 ns
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 11% Great: 20%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 1%

Tree trunk

Desktop 17%

Surfboard

Workstation 1%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core2 Duo T7300Intel $90Bench 34%, 2,712 samples	4x
Core2 Duo T5250Intel $90Bench 31%, 962 samples	3x
Core2 Duo T5800IntelBench 34%, 3,175 samples	2x

GPU
Intel 965 Express Chipset FamilyMobileBench 0%, 3,066 samples	5x
GeForce 8400M GSNvidiaBench 1%, 2,357 samples	3x
GeForce 8400M GNvidiaBench 0%, 305 samples	2x

SSD
Green 240GB (2018)WD $35Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	2x
PLUS 240GBSandiskBench 45%, 86,316 samples	1x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	1x

Value: 37% - Below average

Total price: $125

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16