Asus ZenBook Q536FD_Q536FD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics20.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
CPU throttled at 90% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemAsus ZenBook Q536FD_Q536FD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Q536FD
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190531
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 02 '21 at 07:53
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%
CPU Throttled 90%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8565U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
87.1% Excellent
Memory 91.5
1-Core 112
2-Core 280
88% 161 Pts
4-Core 449
8-Core 626
68% 538 Pts
64-Core 617
38% 617 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 87.1%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design
Asus(1043 1B5E) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.6231
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
20.5% Poor
Lighting 24.4
Reflection 36.3
Parallax 26.3
20% 29 fps
MRender 33.6
Gravity 28.8
Splatting 20.1
22% 27.5 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 20.5%
Great: 23%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$137
757GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 356 382 380 370 385 401 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 461
Write 406
Mixed 403
SusWrite 379
93% 412 MB/s
4K Read 33.5
4K Write 67.9
4K Mixed 44.5
144% 48.6 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 331
DQ Mixed 350
264% 352 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 102%
Great: 133%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$147
737GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1016 1111 1113 1056 1098 1135 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
223% Outstanding
Read 492
Write 486
Mixed 479
SusWrite 1,088
145% 636 MB/s
4K Read 68.3
4K Write 162
4K Mixed 92.5
308% 108 MB/s
DQ Read 1,131
DQ Write 698
DQ Mixed 949
698% 926 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 223%
Great: 372%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K44BM0-CRC 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
78.6% Very good
MC Read 30.6
MC Write 29.4
MC Mixed 22.8
79% 27.6 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 32.6
SC Mixed 24.3
70% 24.7 GB/s
Latency 64.9
62% 64.9 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 78.6%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 10: 0R 2G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
10% 4% 136 339 273 60 15.5" 1536 864 BOE07D9
Typical ZenBook Q536FD_Q536FD Builds (Compare 134 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Asus ZenBook Q536FD_Q536FD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-13600K $232Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $378WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback