Asrock X99X Killer

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics26.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive61.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock X99X Killer  (all builds)
Memory24.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180406
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 31 '21 at 19:16
Run Duration191 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 51%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6800K-$103
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
76.7% Very good
Memory 89.4
1-Core 86.9
2-Core 168
68% 115 Pts
4-Core 346
8-Core 562
56% 454 Pts
64-Core 713
44% 713 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 76.7%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
CLim: 2164 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 471.68
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
26.1% Poor
Lighting 36.6
Reflection 4.5
Parallax 37.2
30% 26.1 fps
MRender 0.3
Gravity 38
Splatting 27.6
19% 22 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 26.1%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk X400 512GB-$99
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 228 224 211 198 172 72 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
61.7% Good
Read 358
Write 258
Mixed 160
SusWrite 184
54% 240 MB/s
4K Read 23.7
4K Write 28.8
4K Mixed 25.9
84% 26.1 MB/s
DQ Read 328
DQ Write 112
DQ Mixed 164
136% 202 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 104%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K3000 3TB-$63
3TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 83 84 84 84 83 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
50.7% Above average
Read 93.2
Write 89.2
Mixed 53.1
SusWrite 83.3
58% 79.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
157% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 87%
Intel Raid 1 Volume 8TB
4TB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 80 80 80 86 84 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
45% Average
Read 74.3
Write 79.6
Mixed 74.9
SusWrite 81.5
58% 77.6 MB/s
4K Read 2.5
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.5
202% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 45%
Great: 173%
WD Elements 25A3 14TB
9TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 193 194 199 185 182 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
86.5% Excellent
Read 200
Write 210
Mixed 183
SusWrite 191
268% 196 MB/s
4K Read 8.9
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 3.1
292% 5.5 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 86.5%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C14 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3199 MHz
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
100% Outstanding
MC Read 35.5
MC Write 45.2
MC Mixed 37.1
112% 39.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 16.8
SC Mixed 17.3
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 68.1
59% 68.1 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 100%
Great: 171%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 5 60 27" 1280 720 AUS2701 PA278QV
Typical X99X Killer Builds (Compare 266 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 75%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock X99X Killer - $350

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $923
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback