Asus TUF GAMING FX504GM_FX80GM

Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	5.89% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	93.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Asus TUF GAMING FX504GM_FX80GM (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FX504GM
Memory	10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit, Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180928
Uptime	15.9 Days
Run Date	Aug 31 '21 at 14:24
Run Duration	228 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8750H 442,631 User benchmarks, average bench 70% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	89.8% Excellent	Memory 89.2 1-Core 120 2-Core 230 83% 146 Pts	4-Core 486 8-Core 793 78% 640 Pts	64-Core 974 60% 974 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 89.8% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Asus(1043 1391) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6446 Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	5.89% Terrible	Lighting 6 Reflection 72.7 Parallax 6.9 5% 28.5 fps	MRender 10.6 Gravity 6.9 Splatting 10.8 8% 9.43 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.89% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ 256GB 18,615 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 70GB free (System drive) Firmware: E8FK11.C SusWrite @10s intervals: 398 211 213 322 222 212 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	93.1% Outstanding	Read 493 Write 636 Mixed 558 SusWrite 263 110% 488 MB/s	4K Read 20.1 4K Write 57.2 4K Mixed 28.4 97% 35.2 MB/s	DQ Read 696 DQ Write 531 DQ Mixed 496 403% 574 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 93.1% Great: 126%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB 179,769 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 210GB free Firmware: JU0C0J SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 85 85 88 89 89 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	65.7% Good	Read 140 Write 136 Mixed 56.2 SusWrite 87.4 77% 105 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 5.5 4K Mixed 0.6 227% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 65.7% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK Transcend JM2666HSB-8G 16GB 157 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 2667, 2667 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	79.7% Very good	MC Read 31.8 MC Write 30.3 MC Mixed 22.3 80% 28.1 GB/s	SC Read 17.5 SC Write 30.8 SC Mixed 26.5 71% 24.9 GB/s	Latency 68.2 59% 68.2 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 79.7% Great: 85%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	46	238	69	60	15.5"	1536 864	NCP0029

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING FX504GM_FX80GM Builds (Compare 1,213 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 35%

Sail boat

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 30%

Sail boat

System: Asus TUF GAMING FX504GM_FX80GM

CPU
Core i7-8750HIntelBench 70%, 442,631 samples	732x
Core i5-8300HIntelBench 65%, 167,898 samples	481x

GPU
GTX 1060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 47%, 177,775 samples	635x
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	577x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	1x

SSD
RBUSNS8154P3256GJ 256GBKingstonBench 96%, 18,615 samples	218x
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV256TBN 256GBBench 72%, 50,765 samples	199x
RBUSNS8154P3128GJ 128GBKingstonBench 81%, 18,233 samples	172x

RAM
HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 1x8GBHynixBench 40%, 73,050 samples	234x
HMA82GS6CJR8N-VK 1x16GBHynixBench 44%, 33,430 samples	175x
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 96,646 samples	86x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16