Medion D3F3-EM

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 50% Yacht	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	2.62% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	89.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Medion D3F3-EM (all builds)
Motherboard	MEDION D3F3-EM
Memory	0.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140514
Uptime	5 Days
Run Date	Aug 31 '21 at 10:33
Run Duration	153 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	25%

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A10-7800 APU (2014 D.Ka) 15,719 User benchmarks, average bench 41% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	50% Above average	Memory 68.4 1-Core 68.6 2-Core 122 52% 86.2 Pts	4-Core 185 8-Core 187 25% 186 Pts	64-Core 199 12% 199 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 50% Great: 50%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics 25,284 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Elitegroup(1019 9A18) 64MB Ram: 64MB, Driver: 20.10.35.02 Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	2.62% Terrible	Lighting 2.6 Reflection 4.3 Parallax 6.3 2% 4.4 fps	MRender 4.1 Gravity 4.8 Splatting 4.3 4% 4.4 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 2.62% Great: 8%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 53GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 320 339 338 341 338 341 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	89.3% Excellent	Read 359 Write 282 Mixed 328 SusWrite 336 74% 326 MB/s	4K Read 28.7 4K Write 81.6 4K Mixed 41.7 140% 50.7 MB/s	DQ Read 250 DQ Write 232 DQ Mixed 240 181% 241 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 89.3% Great: 133%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$50 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2TB free Firmware: MX4OABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 176 180 180 179 179 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	108% Outstanding	Read 199 Write 192 Mixed 40.1 SusWrite 178 110% 152 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.6 147% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT25664BA186D-8FAE 2x2GB 214 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing below potential (23^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	30% Poor	MC Read 12.8 MC Write 6.6 MC Mixed 11.8 30% 10.4 GB/s	SC Read 7.2 SC Write 6.7 SC Mixed 9.3 22% 7.73 GB/s	Latency 105 38% 105 ns
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 30% Great: 37%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	10	8	60	23"	1280 720	LEN61AB LEN T23i-10

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical D3F3-EM Builds (Compare 32 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 44%

Speed boat

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

System: Medion D3F3-EM

CPU
A10-7800 APU (2014 D.Ka)AMDBench 41%, 15,719 samples	29x
Athlon II X4 860KAMD $51Bench 45%, 29,887 samples	2x
A10-7870K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMD $135Bench 46%, 9,821 samples	1x

GPU
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 25,284 samples	16x
R9 290AMD $399Bench 46%, 68,699 samples	4x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	3x

SSD
SSD Plus 240GBSanDisk $28Bench 61%, 133,640 samples	3x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	2x
SSD 64GBSanDisk $56Bench 38%, 3,862 samples	1x

RAM
CT25664BA186D-8FAE 2x2GBCrucialBench 33%, 214 samples	9x
M2F8G64CB8HB5N-DI 2x8GBNanyaBench 55%, 1,721 samples	5x
M378B1G73DB0-CK0 2x8GBSamsungBench 55%, 9,947 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 20% - Very poor

Total price: $28

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16