HP Beata 15 Notaook pc

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics4.03% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemHP Beata 15 Notaook pc  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 22A8
Memory3.5 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140929
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 31 '21 at 00:33
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-5545M APU
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
35.7% Below average
Memory 51.1
1-Core 47.4
2-Core 76.9
36% 58.5 Pts
4-Core 118
8-Core 125
16% 122 Pts
64-Core 130
8% 130 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8510G
HP(103C 22A8) 768MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1101.0
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
4.03% Terrible
Lighting 5
Reflection 6.2
Parallax 4.9
4% 5.37 fps
MRender 4.4
Gravity 4.5
Splatting 5.3
4% 4.73 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.03%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteonit LCS-256L9S-11 2.5 7mm 256GB
212GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HC8110E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 246 276 260 274 289 276 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
62.3% Good
Read 321
Write 272
Mixed 241
SusWrite 270
62% 276 MB/s
4K Read 20.9
4K Write 44.6
4K Mixed 23.7
86% 29.7 MB/s
DQ Read 154
DQ Write 140
DQ Mixed 122
99% 139 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT425S6CFR6A-PB Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 6GB
1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
22.2% Poor
MC Read 10.5
MC Write 4.4
MC Mixed 8.1
22% 7.67 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 4.5
SC Mixed 7.7
18% 6.27 GB/s
Latency 157
26% 157 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 22.2%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback