Medion Erazer X5332 F/B622

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics46.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive42.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemMedion Erazer X5332 F/B622  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION MS-7848
Memory11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150717
Uptime5.9 Days
Run DateAug 30 '21 at 18:32
Run Duration211 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$135
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
82.7% Excellent
Memory 86.7
1-Core 85.1
2-Core 230
74% 134 Pts
4-Core 426
8-Core 601
65% 514 Pts
64-Core 596
37% 596 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 82.7%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Elitegroup(1019 1029) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.68
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
46.1% Average
Lighting 55.6
Reflection 66.2
Parallax 58.6
45% 60.1 fps
MRender 65.5
Gravity 57.4
Splatting 53.6
48% 58.8 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TE256HMHP-00000 256GB
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0100Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 34 31 31 32 32 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
42.6% Average
Read 346
Write 46.5
Mixed 64.5
SusWrite 33
26% 123 MB/s
4K Read 19.7
4K Write 36.3
4K Mixed 14.2
67% 23.4 MB/s
DQ Read 251
DQ Write 52.4
DQ Mixed 35.1
56% 113 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 93%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$52
884GB free
Firmware: CC54
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 36 36 36 36 36 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
44% Average
Read 121
Write 2.5
Mixed 7.7
SusWrite 32.9
30% 40.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.2
45% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 44%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya M2F8G64CB8HD5N-DI 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
58.9% Above average
MC Read 21.6
MC Write 21.4
MC Mixed 17.4
58% 20.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 21.8
SC Mixed 20.1
56% 19.5 GB/s
Latency 70.7
57% 70.7 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 62: 7R 9G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
62% 55% 29 41 5 144 24" 1920 1080 AUS24A4 MG248
History: Score 28: 3R 3G 4B | Score 62: 7R 9G 0B
Typical Erazer X5332 F/B622 Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

System: Medion Erazer X5332 F/B622

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $236
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback