QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 43%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (70%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory18.1 GB free of 20 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140401
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 30 '21 at 14:53
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 70%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Westmere E56xx/L56xx/X56xx (IBRS update)
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.45 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
43% Average
Memory 55.7
1-Core 87.1
2-Core 177
58% 107 Pts
4-Core 176
8-Core 179
24% 178 Pts
64-Core 182
11% 182 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 43%
Great: 59%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 69GB
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 844
Write 674
Mixed 730
167% 750 MB/s
4K Read 12.8
4K Write 9.7
4K Mixed 9.4
37% 10.6 MB/s
DQ Read 138
DQ Write 120
DQ Mixed 145
104% 134 MB/s
Poor: 23% Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 20GB
0, 0 MHz
16384, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
34.6% Below average
MC Read 16
MC Write 10.5
MC Mixed 12.5
37% 13 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 6.5
19% 6.77 GB/s
Latency 141
28% 141 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 34.6%
Great: 125%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 1 1 0 64 0" 1920 1200
Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 606 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $485
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback