Asus P8H77-M PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 66%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics84.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive60.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8H77-M PRO  (all builds)
Memory16.5 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141017
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateAug 29 '21 at 21:17
Run Duration373 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 23%
Watch Gameplay: 5700 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
76.6% Very good
Memory 89.3
1-Core 104
2-Core 184
74% 126 Pts
4-Core 346
8-Core 498
53% 422 Pts
64-Core 503
31% 503 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-$275
Asus(1043 04E4) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.6.1
Performing below potential (63rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
84.6% Excellent
Lighting 109
Reflection 35.9
Parallax 161
89% 102 fps
MRender 100
Gravity 111
Splatting 77.4
77% 96.3 fps
Poor: 78%
This bench: 84.6%
Great: 91%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
58GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0AB0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 94 45 42 43 42 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
60.6% Good
Read 382
Write 364
Mixed 269
SusWrite 59.8
60% 269 MB/s
4K Read 29.3
4K Write 57.5
4K Mixed 37.5
123% 41.4 MB/s
DQ Read 40.5
DQ Write 102
DQ Mixed 52.7
46% 65.2 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 118%
WDS500G3XHC-00SJG0 500GB
309GB free
Firmware: 102000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 754 852 856 865 868 865 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
175% Outstanding
Read 1131
Write 1,038
Mixed 1047
SusWrite 843
228% 1,015 MB/s
4K Read 31.7
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 47.2
162% 60 MB/s
DQ Read 707
DQ Write 537
DQ Mixed 628
468% 624 MB/s
Poor: 184%
This bench: 175%
Great: 288%
WD Green 2TB (2009)-$113
2TB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 99 46 43 43 42 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
43% Average
Read 88.2
Write 90.1
Mixed 62.6
SusWrite 61.1
56% 75.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.7
150% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 43%
Great: 60%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$65
737GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
5.91% Terrible
Read 16.2
Write 1.7
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 4
5% 6.53 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.8
131% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 5.91%
Great: 57%
StoreJet Transcend 2TB
324GB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 17 17 16 17 16 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
8.73% Terrible
Read 13.7
Write 15
Mixed 13.7
SusWrite 16.6
20% 14.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.3
45% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 8.73%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-10666CL9-4GBRL 04CD F3-10666CL9-8GBXL 04CD F3-10666CL9-4GBRL 04CD F3-10666CL9-8GBXL 24GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
48.4% Average
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 16.6
MC Mixed 15
46% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 16.4
SC Mixed 15.6
44% 15.4 GB/s
Latency 68.1
59% 68.1 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 31: 2R 6G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
31% 21% 52 243 182 60 27" 1920 1080 BNQ78E6 BenQ GW2780
History: Score 16: 2R 1G 3B | Score 31: 2R 6G 3B
Typical P8H77-M PRO Builds (Compare 703 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus P8H77-M PRO - $360

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $802
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback