PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
Graphics | 35.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 89.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-F2A78M-HD2 (all builds) |
Memory | 12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20150427 |
Uptime | 1 Days |
Run Date | Aug 29 '21 at 16:35 |
Run Duration | 178 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 11% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD A10-7850K APU (2014 D.Ka)-$135
P0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
|
38.3%
Below average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R9 280X-$500
XFX(1682 3001) 3GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 21.5.2
Performing below potential (58th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
35.2%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Ct500mx5 0 500GB
421GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 291 339 396 313 299 342 MB/s
|
89.7%
Excellent
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$31
626GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 180 183 174 177 182 MB/s
|
104%
Outstanding
|
|||
Seagate Expansion 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0712
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 36 38 35 36 38 MB/s
|
20.8%
Poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Corsair Vengeance Pro DDR3 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
31.8%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
12% | 5% | 84 | 192 | 27 | 60 | 21.5" | 1920 1080 | AOC2250 2250W |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
A8-7650K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMDBench 44%, 15,487 samples | 30x |
A8-7600 APU (2014 D.Ka)AMDBench 42%, 31,243 samples | 27x |
Athlon II X4 860KAMD $51Bench 45%, 29,887 samples | 27x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 28x |
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 22,117 samples | 22x |
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 25,284 samples | 12x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 85% - Excellent | Total price: $88 |