| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
| Graphics | 0.62% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
Very high background CPU (63%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 90% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
| System | CASPER CASPER NIRVANA |
| Motherboard | Casper NIRVANA (all builds) |
| Memory | 1.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk |
| OS | Windows 8.1 |
| BIOS Date | 20130416 |
| Uptime | 5.1 Days |
| Run Date | Aug 29 '21 at 12:29 |
| Run Duration | 159 Seconds |
| Run User | TUR-User |
| Background CPU | 63% |
| CPU Throttled | 90% |
PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Pentium 2020M
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
|
36.1%
Below average
|
40% 61.2 Pts
|
9% 66.5 Pts
|
5% 77.2 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel HD Graphics (G3 Pentium/Celeron 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Device(1B0A 2210) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5161
|
0.62%
Terrible
|
0% 1.2 fps
|
2% 1.83 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB-$14
240GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 03.01A03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 21 11 18 20 29 MB/s
|
19.5%
Very poor
|
26% 34.8 MB/s
|
76% 0.57 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nanya NT4GC64B8HD0NS-CG 1x4GB
1 of 1 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
|
19.1%
Very poor
|
17% 5.97 GB/s
|
19% 6.8 GB/s
|
33% 122 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical NIRVANA Builds (Compare 849 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Casper NIRVANA
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples | 93x |
| Core i5-3210MIntel $52Bench 48%, 79,744 samples | 84x |
| Core i5-7500Intel $89Bench 67%, 149,467 samples | 76x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples | 171x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 69x |
| RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples | 63x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 94% - Outstanding | Total price: $67 |