Asrock 970M Pro3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics30.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock 970M Pro3  (all builds)
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160617
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 29 '21 at 07:47
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-4100-$110
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
55.8% Above average
Memory 83.1
1-Core 56
2-Core 109
53% 82.6 Pts
4-Core 168
8-Core 164
22% 166 Pts
64-Core 172
11% 172 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.68
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
30.5% Below average
Lighting 38.2
Reflection 49.6
Parallax 35.7
31% 41.2 fps
MRender 39
Gravity 41
Splatting 29.4
29% 36.5 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 30.5%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS2 40G2G0A-00JH 240GB
102GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF50
SusWrite @10s intervals: 203 43 75 33 105 20 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
38.8% Below average
Read 394
Write 272
Mixed 142
SusWrite 79.9
49% 222 MB/s
4K Read 18.4
4K Write 21.3
4K Mixed 13.6
57% 17.8 MB/s
DQ Read 19.8
DQ Write 25.8
DQ Mixed 13.4
13% 19.7 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 38.8%
Great: 50%
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$23
284GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 79 80 79 80 80 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
36.6% Below average
Read 47.8
Write 47.5
Mixed 38.5
SusWrite 79.2
39% 53.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
142% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 54%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
615GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 79 80 79 80 80 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
67.2% Good
Read 154
Write 149
Mixed 91
SusWrite 79.1
87% 118 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1.2
243% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GU6BFR8A-PB 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
30.8% Below average
MC Read 11
MC Write 9.4
MC Mixed 9.7
29% 10 GB/s
SC Read 8.7
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 9.6
25% 8.77 GB/s
Latency 74.9
53% 74.9 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970M Pro3 Builds (Compare 843 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970M Pro3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $217
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback