Biostar TP67XE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics20% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive59% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 18 months ago.
MotherboardBiostar TP67XE  (all builds)
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120504
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateAug 28 '21 at 20:57
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
74.5% Very good
Memory 93.9
1-Core 95.6
2-Core 187
74% 126 Pts
4-Core 316
8-Core 340
43% 328 Pts
64-Core 333
21% 333 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 6970
PwrHis(1787 2306) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
20% Poor
Lighting 25.3
Reflection 30.6
Parallax 27.1
21% 27.7 fps
MRender 24.7
Gravity 26.3
Splatting 19.5
19% 23.5 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 20%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 830 128GB-$109
55GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 150 145 144 156 161 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
59% Above average
Read 442
Write 221
Mixed 200
SusWrite 157
56% 255 MB/s
4K Read 19.6
4K Write 41.6
4K Mixed 20
77% 27.1 MB/s
DQ Read 295
DQ Write 71.5
DQ Mixed 112
101% 160 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 59%
Great: 76%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$40
729GB free
Firmware: 05.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 86 86 85 85 85 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
56.3% Above average
Read 110
Write 104
Mixed 97.6
SusWrite 85.4
74% 99.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
214% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 76%
WD 1200BEV External 120GB
53GB free, PID 1010
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 25 25 25 25 25 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
14.9% Very poor
Read 27.9
Write 23.3
Mixed 20.1
SusWrite 25.2
32% 24.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.9%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-12800CL9-4GBXL F3-12800CL9-4GBXL 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
59.2% Above average
MC Read 21.4
MC Write 21.5
MC Mixed 19
59% 20.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 16.8
SC Mixed 16.6
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 60.1
67% 60.1 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 7.2" 1280 720 SAM07BC SAMSUNG
Typical TP67XE Builds (Compare 61 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Biostar TP67XE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $430
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback