Asus X542URR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive89.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 90% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemAsus X542URR  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X542URR
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190521
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 28 '21 at 14:35
Run Duration210 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU 12%
CPU Throttled 90%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8550U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
63.6% Good
Memory 88.1
1-Core 118
2-Core 226
82% 144 Pts
4-Core 252
8-Core 114
28% 183 Pts
64-Core 110
7% 110 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia 930MX
Asus(1043 143E) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.14.7111
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
6.5% Terrible
Lighting 6.8
Reflection 5
Parallax 8.8
6% 6.87 fps
MRender 12.3
Gravity 11.2
Splatting 8.1
8% 10.5 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 6.5%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 Evo 250GB-$31
80GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 255 268 293 273 295 280 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
89.8% Excellent
Read 434
Write 357
Mixed 287
SusWrite 277
76% 339 MB/s
4K Read 30.7
4K Write 86.3
4K Mixed 33.1
135% 50 MB/s
DQ Read 366
DQ Write 293
DQ Mixed 252
210% 304 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 89.8%
Great: 128%
ASMT 2115 1TB
537GB free, PID 1153
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 98 104 102 107 109 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
47.2% Average
Read 76.9
Write 108
Mixed 63.4
SusWrite 101
123% 87.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 0.2
162% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 167%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
38.6% Below average
MC Read 14.9
MC Write 12.5
MC Mixed 10.5
36% 12.6 GB/s
SC Read 11.5
SC Write 13.4
SC Mixed 11.7
35% 12.2 GB/s
Latency 69.4
58% 69.4 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 51: 8R 1G 8B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
51% 14% 125 125 66 60 15.5" 1366 768 CMN15DB
History: Score 31: 4R 2G 5B | Score 51: 8R 1G 8B
Typical X542URR Builds (Compare 323 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X542URR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback