Gigabyte GA-H110M-A

Performance Results


Gaming 140% UFO	Desktop 92% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 119% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	160% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Gigabyte H110M-A
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H110M-A (all builds)
Memory	10 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20161108
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 27 '21 at 18:45
Run Duration	178 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	10%

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700K-$242 712,312 User benchmarks, average bench 84% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	89.8% Excellent	Memory 88.7 1-Core 137 2-Core 268 91% 165 Pts	4-Core 489 8-Core 720 75% 605 Pts	64-Core 710 44% 710 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 89.8% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-Ti-$600 218,061 User benchmarks, average bench 158% EVGA(3842 3797) CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.68 Performing below potential (51^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	160% Outstanding	Lighting 234 Reflection 213 Parallax 210 191% 219 fps	MRender 251 Gravity 161 Splatting 130 142% 181 fps
Poor: 139% ↑ This bench: 160% Great: 170%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 9GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK61K1 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 465 Write 376 Mixed 338 87% 393 MB/s	4K Read 32.9 4K Write 73.3 4K Mixed 20.6 115% 42.3 MB/s	DQ Read 200 DQ Write 64.2 DQ Mixed 9.9 39% 91.5 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 100%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 33GB free Firmware: SBFK61K1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 392 223 66 8.7 4.9 54 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	81.1% Excellent	Read 492 Write 328 Mixed 342 SusWrite 125 72% 322 MB/s	4K Read 33.5 4K Write 93.5 4K Mixed 31.6 141% 52.9 MB/s	DQ Read 207 DQ Write 309 DQ Mixed 169 153% 228 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 81.1% Great: 100%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$30 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 87GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 89 89 90 92 88 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	71.9% Very good	Read 161 Write 168 Mixed 32 SusWrite 89.5 81% 113 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.7 146% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 71.9% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 16ATF1G64AZ-2G1B1 859B CT8G4DFD8213.C16FBD2 16GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	69.6% Good	MC Read 25.7 MC Write 27.8 MC Mixed 22.6 72% 25.4 GB/s	SC Read 11.5 SC Write 16.1 SC Mixed 23.4 49% 17 GB/s	Latency 68.8 58% 68.8 ns
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 69.6% Great: 96%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 17: 2R 2G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
17%	15%	33	314	247	120	24.5"	1920 1080	ACR0591 KG251Q

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H110M-A-CF Builds (Compare 1,636 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 42%

Speed boat

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 34%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110M-A - $60

CPU
Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	431x
Core i3-6100Intel $76Bench 55%, 110,166 samples	196x
Core i5-6600KIntel $81Bench 72%, 342,244 samples	156x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	150x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	145x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	128x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	57x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	57x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	43x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	59x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	54x
Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x4GBHyperX $67Bench 69%, 46,617 samples	36x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 108% - Outstanding

Total price: $312

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16