Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 26% Raft	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.4% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	67.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N4020 5,047 User benchmarks, average bench 21% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	21.1% Poor	Memory 22.7 1-Core 55.7 2-Core 98.9 31% 59.1 Pts	4-Core 112 8-Core 116 15% 114 Pts	64-Core 112 7% 112 Pts
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 21.1% Great: 29%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600 35,976 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Device(1E63 003E) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7986 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	0.4% Terrible	Lighting 0.4 Reflection 0.7 Parallax 0.9 0% 0.67 fps	MRender 0.8 Gravity 0.5 Splatting 0.7 0% 0.67 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.4% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston OM8P0S3256B-A0 256GB 154 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 208GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK62A3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 314 295 302 295 267 267 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	67.6% Good	Read 398 Write 240 Mixed 312 SusWrite 290 69% 310 MB/s	4K Read 21 4K Write 34.4 4K Mixed 25.8 83% 27.1 MB/s	DQ Read 200 DQ Write 159 DQ Mixed 179 134% 179 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 67.6% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
ABCD 123456789012345678 2x4GB 783 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	18% Very poor	MC Read 5 MC Write 8.2 MC Mixed 7.1 19% 6.77 GB/s	SC Read 2.7 SC Write 5 SC Mixed 3.6 11% 3.77 GB/s	Latency 301 13% 301 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 18% Great: 29%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	8	6	60	14"	1280 701	NCP0056

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16