Asrock 970M Pro3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics45% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock 970M Pro3  (all builds)
Memory27.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160617
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 27 '21 at 09:19
Run Duration215 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 16%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8150-$770
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
59.4% Above average
Memory 78.7
1-Core 64.7
2-Core 130
56% 91 Pts
4-Core 218
8-Core 356
35% 287 Pts
64-Core 367
23% 367 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1286 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.8.2
Performing below potential (56th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
45% Average
Lighting 56.1
Reflection 60.4
Parallax 75.9
46% 64.1 fps
MRender 60.2
Gravity 58.9
Splatting 44.5
44% 54.5 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 45%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
JOYSSD256 256GB
143GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0817A0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 464
Write 322
Mixed 34.1
60% 273 MB/s
4K Read 18.8
4K Write 20.8
4K Mixed 0.7
40% 13.4 MB/s
DQ Read 159
DQ Write 142
DQ Mixed 1.3
42% 101 MB/s
Poor: 24% Great: 88%
Hitachi HUA722010ALA330 1TB
865GB free
Firmware: JP4ONS01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 123
Write 76.8
Mixed 63.3
65% 87.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 38% Great: 75%
WD Blue 2.5" 160GB (2009)-$23
17GB free
Firmware: 11.01A11
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 39.1
Mixed 30.8
27% 34.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
143% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 36%
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$23
441GB free
Firmware: 01.00A02
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 92.5
Write 42.5
Mixed 60.3
49% 65.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
112% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 20% Great: 54%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 64GB
1GB free, PID 5575
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 30
Write 8
Mixed 13.4
18% 17.1 MB/s
4K Read 3.3
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.9
162% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M378B1G73AH0-K0 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
46.8% Average
MC Read 20.1
MC Write 14.9
MC Mixed 16.2
49% 17.1 GB/s
SC Read 8.7
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 12.2
28% 9.9 GB/s
Latency 83
48% 83 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 6 60 32" 1280 720 MST0030 MStar Demo
Typical 970M Pro3 Builds (Compare 843 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970M Pro3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $217
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback