Toshiba SATELLITE C70-B

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 35% Jet ski	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	2.68% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	41.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Toshiba SATELLITE C70-B (all builds)
Motherboard	TOSHIBA Portable PC
Memory	5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140818
Uptime	0.7 Days
Run Date	Aug 27 '21 at 06:49
Run Duration	148 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	23%

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4210U 82,966 User benchmarks, average bench 41% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 1.75 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	35.1% Below average	Memory 48 1-Core 34.5 2-Core 85.1 34% 55.9 Pts	4-Core 130 8-Core 130 17% 130 Pts	64-Core 129 8% 129 Pts
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 35.1% Great: 53%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Toshiba(1179 F934) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5070 Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	2.68% Terrible	Lighting 3 Reflection 4.6 Parallax 5.2 2% 4.27 fps	MRender 5.9 Gravity 2 Splatting 3.8 3% 3.9 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.68% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 480GB-$38 83,298 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 387GB free (System drive) Firmware: M6CR041 SusWrite @10s intervals: 327 338 145 139 105 112 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	41.4% Average	Read 355 Write 325 Mixed 43.9 SusWrite 194 51% 230 MB/s	4K Read 9.5 4K Write 14.4 4K Mixed 1.6 24% 8.5 MB/s	DQ Read 165 DQ Write 230 DQ Mixed 31.8 70% 142 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 41.4% Great: 92%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 2x4GB 26,681 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	43.5% Average	MC Read 15.5 MC Write 17.6 MC Mixed 16.1 47% 16.4 GB/s	SC Read 9.1 SC Write 7.2 SC Mixed 13.5 28% 9.93 GB/s	Latency 168 24% 168 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 43.5% Great: 56%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	8	6	60	17.3"	1280 720	SEC504B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical SATELLITE C70-B Builds (Compare 55 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 38%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Toshiba SATELLITE C70-B

CPU
Core i3-4005UIntelBench 39%, 37,483 samples	24x
Core i5-5200UIntelBench 42%, 107,407 samples	19x
Core i5-4210UIntelBench 41%, 82,966 samples	8x

GPU
HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 275,372 samples	33x
HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)IntelBench 4%, 231,498 samples	19x
HD GraphicsIntelBench 2%, 3,725 samples	2x

SSD
PLUS 240GBSandiskBench 45%, 86,316 samples	2x
BX500 240GBCrucial $29Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	2x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	2x

RAM
M471B5173DB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 24%, 51,191 samples	15x
M471B5173QH0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 25%, 38,580 samples	8x
M471B1G73QH0-YK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 28%, 40,451 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16