Performance Results


Gaming 86% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 100% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 84% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	85.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	152% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9880H 11,095 User benchmarks, average bench 79% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	94.5% Outstanding	Memory 89 1-Core 142 2-Core 282 94% 171 Pts	4-Core 536 8-Core 972 90% 754 Pts	64-Core 1,234 76% 1,234 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 94.5% Great: 90%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070 (Mobile Max-Q) 10,818 User benchmarks, average bench 79% MSI(1462 1277) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.14.7141 Performing below potential (77^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	85.3% Excellent	Lighting 102 Reflection 105 Parallax 117 83% 108 fps	MRender 147 Gravity 98.9 Splatting 92 90% 112 fps
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 85.3% Great: 94%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Nvme Seagate FireCuda 2TB 145 User benchmarks, average bench 286% 1TB free (System drive) Firmware: STES1024 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 982 791 472 744 820 748 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	152% Outstanding	Read 376 Write 1,383 Mixed 1,111 SusWrite 760 208% 907 MB/s	4K Read 32.5 4K Write 90.1 4K Mixed 47.2 157% 56.6 MB/s	DQ Read 1,043 DQ Write 816 DQ Mixed 887 675% 915 MB/s
Poor: 161% ↑ This bench: 152% Great: 480%
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 2TB 2,668 User benchmarks, average bench 111% 508GB free Firmware: RVT21B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 466 464 462 459 450 454 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	110% Outstanding	Read 498 Write 434 Mixed 422 SusWrite 459 102% 453 MB/s	4K Read 35 4K Write 73.3 4K Mixed 46.7 152% 51.7 MB/s	DQ Read 362 DQ Write 306 DQ Mixed 329 248% 332 MB/s
Poor: 83% ↑ This bench: 110% Great: 133%
Nvme Samsung SSD 970 2TB 10,220 User benchmarks, average bench 331% 625GB free Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1538 1273 1275 1279 1188 1081 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	276% Outstanding	Read 2,343 Write 2302 Mixed 1592 SusWrite 1,272 421% 1,877 MB/s	4K Read 45.6 4K Write 96.9 4K Mixed 61.4 199% 68 MB/s	DQ Read 1,083 DQ Write 848 DQ Mixed 961 720% 964 MB/s
Poor: 221% ↑ This bench: 276% Great: 431%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown BL32G32C16S4B.M16FB1 2x31.5GB 350 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2 of 2 slots used 63GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	95.8% Outstanding	MC Read 35.1 MC Write 37.8 MC Mixed 29.9 98% 34.3 GB/s	SC Read 21.4 SC Write 39.3 SC Mixed 28.5 85% 29.7 GB/s	Latency 68.5 58% 68.5 ns
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 95.8% Great: 105%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
6%	7%	55	108	5	60	17.2"	1536 864	AUO309B

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 13%

Tree trunk

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	405x
RTX 2070 (Mobile Max-Q)NvidiaBench 79%, 10,818 samples	290x
RTX 2080 (Mobile Max-Q)NvidiaBench 90%, 7,789 samples	138x

SSD
PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsungBench 239%, 34,988 samples	375x
PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 217%, 80,540 samples	93x
PC SN720 SDAPNTW-1T00 1TBWDCBench 230%, 571 samples	56x

RAM
M471A2K43CB1-CTD 2x16GBSamsungBench 82%, 20,439 samples	242x
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 108,106 samples	219x
HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 2x8GBHynixBench 74%, 28,425 samples	72x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16