Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X1603ZA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics7.12% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 90% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X1603ZA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X1603ZA
Memory9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2400 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210820
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateAug 26 '21 at 04:23
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU 19%
CPU Throttled 90%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel 0000
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 1 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
80.2% Excellent
Memory 61.4
1-Core 162
2-Core 313
93% 179 Pts
4-Core 543
8-Core 697
79% 620 Pts
64-Core 826
51% 826 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Asus(1043 1E92) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 30.0.100.9885
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
7.12% Terrible
Lighting 6.7
Reflection 1.9
Parallax 8.1
6% 5.57 fps
MRender 13.9
Gravity 13.6
Splatting 11.1
10% 12.9 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.12%
Great: 15%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Micron_2210_MTFDHBA1T0QFD 1TB
44GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P6MA007 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 1,644
Write 1,648
Mixed 1230
1,125% 1,507 MB/s
4K Read 55.1
4K Write 135
4K Mixed 74.5
13,066% 88.1 MB/s
DQ Read 782
DQ Write 484
DQ Mixed 310
3,802% 526 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-3G2R1 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
88.7% Excellent
MC Read 37.6
MC Write 32.5
MC Mixed 31.7
97% 33.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 29.8
SC Mixed 18.8
59% 20.6 GB/s
Latency 124
32% 124 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 88.7%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 16" 1280 720 SDC415D
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-13600K $232Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback