Gateway FX6840

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics45.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGateway FX6840  (all builds)
MotherboardGateway FX6840
Memory3.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100517
Uptime14.5 Days
Run DateAug 25 '21 at 21:23
Run Duration259 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 860-$339
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
68.7% Good
Memory 93.8
1-Core 78.4
2-Core 136
64% 103 Pts
4-Core 239
8-Core 336
36% 287 Pts
64-Core 331
20% 331 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
PNY(196E 11D9) 3GB
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 471.41
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
45.2% Average
Lighting 51.2
Reflection 65.9
Parallax 59.7
42% 58.9 fps
MRender 63.2
Gravity 65.9
Splatting 61.8
52% 63.6 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 66 75 55 57 59 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
55.7% Above average
Read 130
Write 84.4
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 63.6
56% 76.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
134% 1 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 107%
WD WD2500JD-00HBB0 250GB-$140
47GB free
Firmware: 02.05D02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 39 41 40 41 40 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
17.1% Very poor
Read 18.9
Write 42.7
Mixed 22.3
SusWrite 40.2
23% 31 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
123% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 17.1%
Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown GU512303EP0202 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
40.1% Average
MC Read 14.2
MC Write 13.2
MC Mixed 12.4
38% 13.3 GB/s
SC Read 10.2
SC Write 10
SC Mixed 12.5
31% 10.9 GB/s
Latency 60.3
66% 60.3 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 81: 10R 7G 10B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
81% 48% 56 193 116 144 27" 1920 1080 SAM0E41 C27FG7x
History: Score 56: 5R 7G 10B | Score 81: 10R 7G 10B
Typical FX6840 Builds (Compare 106 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: Gateway FX6840

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $427
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $15Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback