Asus P8P67 DELUXE

Performance Results


Gaming 25% Surfboard	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 21% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	30.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	59% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (56%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus P8P67 DELUXE (all builds)
Memory	7.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121031
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Aug 25 '21 at 20:48
Run Duration	221 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	56%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319 147,533 User benchmarks, average bench 71% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	67.1% Good	Memory 89.6 1-Core 85.4 2-Core 161 68% 112 Pts	4-Core 243 8-Core 368 38% 305 Pts	64-Core 429 26% 429 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 67.1% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% PNY(196E 11C3) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.68 Performing below potential (85^th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (40 fps cap detected)	30.9% Below average	Lighting 39.6 Reflection 41 Parallax 39.1 32% 39.9 fps	MRender 37.6 Gravity 40.7 Splatting 27.5 28% 35.3 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 30.9% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 1TB-$210 25,365 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 145GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 150 161 154 151 142 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	59% Above average	Read 392 Write 251 Mixed 301 SusWrite 157 61% 275 MB/s	4K Read 20.9 4K Write 23.4 4K Mixed 18 67% 20.8 MB/s	DQ Read 330 DQ Write 264 DQ Mixed 289 219% 294 MB/s
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 59% Great: 124%
Samsung 860 QVO 2TB-$200 28,979 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 2TB free Firmware: RVQ01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 87 83 78 79 82 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile)	40.5% Average	Read 334 Write 132 Mixed 177 SusWrite 82.1 40% 181 MB/s	4K Read 14.1 4K Write 24.4 4K Mixed 12.6 50% 17 MB/s	DQ Read 198 DQ Write 111 DQ Mixed 140 108% 149 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 40.5% Great: 122%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 2TB-$105 4,536 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1.5TB free Firmware: 1AN10002 SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 64 66 66 63 66 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	42% Average	Read 80.7 Write 34.8 Mixed 37.5 SusWrite 65.4 40% 54.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 42% Great: 59%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 4TB 1,113 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 1TB free, PID d011 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 40 39 39 38 39 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	26.8% Poor	Read 80.8 Write 117 Mixed 53 SusWrite 39.1 98% 72.5 MB/s	4K Read 3.2 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.1 80% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 26.8% Great: 75%
WD easystore 264D 14TB 1,761 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 7.5TB free, PID 264d Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 43 43 43 41 44 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	53% Above average	Read 199 Write 114 Mixed 84.2 SusWrite 43.1 130% 110 MB/s	4K Read 5.6 4K Write 4.4 4K Mixed 2.2 245% 4.07 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 53% Great: 107%
WD easystore 25FB 14TB 201 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 322GB free, PID 25fb Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 44 44 42 41 44 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	49% Average	Read 160 Write 64.2 Mixed 128 SusWrite 43.2 121% 98.9 MB/s	4K Read 4.3 4K Write 5 4K Mixed 1.7 244% 3.67 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 49% Great: 105%
WD My Passport Essential USB 3.0 500GB 2,842 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 388GB free, PID 0730 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 42 43 41 39 43 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	22.9% Poor	Read 65.5 Write 58.4 Mixed 43.4 SusWrite 41.5 68% 52.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.6 69% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 22.9% Great: 32%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB 22,320 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	52% Above average	MC Read 16.9 MC Write 19.6 MC Mixed 17 51% 17.8 GB/s	SC Read 14.4 SC Write 16.2 SC Mixed 15.9 44% 15.5 GB/s	Latency 67.8 59% 67.8 ns
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 52% Great: 63%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	7	5	60	30"	1280 720	DEL4016 DELL 3007WFP

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8P67 DELUXE Builds (Compare 1,059 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 38%

Jet ski

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 31%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 DELUXE - $100

CPU
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples	583x
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples	159x
Core i7-2600Intel $195Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	105x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	76x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	60x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	60x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	41x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	36x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	32x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 20,667 samples	50x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	39x
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBG.SKILLBench 56%, 22,320 samples	25x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $728

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16