Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509JB_X509JB

Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 53% Yacht	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	5.54% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	91.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (81%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509JB_X509JB (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X509JB
Memory	0.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920x1080x4294967296 szín, 1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210112
Uptime	4.4 Days
Run Date	Aug 24 '21 at 11:00
Run Duration	149 Seconds
Run User	HUN-User
Background CPU	81%

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-1005G1 22,960 User benchmarks, average bench 44% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	49.2% Average	Memory 57.8 1-Core 85.6 2-Core 162 57% 102 Pts	4-Core 233 8-Core 252 32% 242 Pts	64-Core 274 17% 274 Pts
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 49.2% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD G1 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Asus(1043 183F) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9365 Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	5.54% Terrible	Lighting 6.1 Reflection 10.4 Parallax 6.9 5% 7.8 fps	MRender 4.9 Gravity 6.9 Splatting 11.1 7% 7.63 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.54% Great: 7%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Nvme HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GB 183 User benchmarks, average bench 126% 40GB free (System drive) Firmware: 80001C00 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 275 261 271 254 209 202 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	91.6% Outstanding	Read 799 Write 566 Mixed 542 SusWrite 245 120% 538 MB/s	4K Read 15.9 4K Write 42.7 4K Mixed 24.8 78% 27.8 MB/s	DQ Read 493 DQ Write 413 DQ Mixed 418 323% 441 MB/s
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 91.6% Great: 155%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 1x4GB 48,985 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	33.2% Below average	MC Read 13.5 MC Write 11.2 MC Mixed 9.1 32% 11.3 GB/s	SC Read 12.2 SC Write 12.2 SC Mixed 10.8 34% 11.7 GB/s	Latency 134 30% 134 ns
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 33.2% Great: 41%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	9	7	60	15.5"	1280 720	AUO21ED

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509JB_X509JB Builds (Compare 375 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 54%

Yacht

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509JB_X509JB

CPU
Core i5-1035G1IntelBench 51%, 53,170 samples	214x
Core i7-1065G7IntelBench 53%, 58,314 samples	106x
Core i3-1005G1IntelBench 44%, 22,960 samples	55x

GPU
UHD G1IntelBench 5%, 68,603 samples	180x
MX110NvidiaBench 6%, 6,322 samples	122x
Iris Plus G7IntelBench 9%, 52,498 samples	73x

SSD
HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GBBench 121%, 26,870 samples	46x
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G-1202 512GBWDCBench 155%, 2,132 samples	31x
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1202 256GBWDCBench 145%, 4,206 samples	23x

RAM
M471A5244CB0-CTD Hynix HMA851S6JJR6N-VK 8GBSamsungBench 58%, 6,259 samples	145x
M471A5244CB0-CTD 2x4GBSamsungBench 60%, 54,777 samples	86x
M471A5244CB0-CTD 1x4GBSamsungBench 30%, 48,985 samples	53x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16