| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 17.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | To Intel X79 (all builds) |
| Memory | 6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | Цвета: 1440 x 900 - 32 Bit |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20200613 |
| Uptime | 0.8 Days |
| Run Date | Aug 23 '21 at 07:04 |
| Run Duration | 138 Seconds |
| Run User | RUS-User |
| Background CPU | 2% |
PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5-2420 v2
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
|
66.8%
Good
|
59% 96.2 Pts
|
44% 357 Pts
|
33% 527 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
|
17.5%
Very poor
|
17% 20.4 fps
|
18% 22 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 250GB-$23
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 70 87 82 86 81 MB/s
|
51.4%
Above average
|
62% 84 MB/s
|
123% 0.8 MB/s
| |
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$32
57GB free
Firmware: JC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 79 78 79 79 79 MB/s
|
56.6%
Above average
|
70% 94.9 MB/s
|
176% 1.2 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Hynix HMT151R7TFR4C 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
50.9%
Above average
|
53% 18.5 GB/s
|
31% 10.9 GB/s
|
53% 74.9 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
| Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0% | 0% | 0 | 9 | 7 | 60 | 19.6" | 1280 720 | SAM036F SyncMaster |
Typical Intel X79 Builds (Compare 1,968 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: To Intel X79
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Xeon E5-2689 0IntelBench 71%, 6,987 samples | 505x |
| Xeon E5-2650 v2IntelBench 67%, 5,123 samples | 215x |
| Xeon E5-2620 0Intel $77Bench 58%, 3,540 samples | 95x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 140x |
| RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples | 112x |
| GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples | 90x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 81% - Excellent | Total price: $158 |