Lenovo 80K4

Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 28% Raft	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	4.84% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	25.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (73%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Lenovo 80K4 (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO Lenovo ideapad 500-15ACZ
Memory	3 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160913
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 20 '21 at 16:08
Run Duration	152 Seconds
Run User	BGR-User
Background CPU	73%

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A8-8600P Radeon R6, 10 Compute Cores 4C+6G 146 User benchmarks, average bench 33% Socket FP4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	24.9% Poor	Memory 28.5 1-Core 39.8 2-Core 65.1 26% 44.5 Pts	4-Core 123 8-Core 124 16% 124 Pts	64-Core 123 8% 123 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 24.9% Great: 40%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R6 Graphics 3,679 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Legend(17AA 380C) 384MB Ram: 384MB, Driver: 21.5.2 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	4.84% Terrible	Lighting 5.7 Reflection 6 Parallax 10.1 5% 7.27 fps	MRender 3.7 Gravity 8.7 Splatting 6.5 5% 6.3 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 4.84% Great: 5%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZYLF128HCHP-000L2 128GB 3,311 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 83GB free (System drive) Firmware: FXT63L1Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 47 51 56 51 56 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	25.7% Poor	Read 176 Write 64.7 Mixed 91.3 SusWrite 51.7 21% 95.8 MB/s	4K Read 14.7 4K Write 19.9 4K Mixed 6.8 42% 13.8 MB/s	DQ Read 132 DQ Write 26.1 DQ Mixed 36 38% 64.6 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 25.7% Great: 61%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
RAMAXEL RMT3170MN68F9F1600 RMT3190MN76F8F1600 6GB 29 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 800, 800 MHz 4096, 2048 MB Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	21.2% Poor	MC Read 9.8 MC Write 5.8 MC Mixed 7.2 22% 7.6 GB/s	SC Read 6.3 SC Write 5.5 SC Mixed 6.4 17% 6.07 GB/s	Latency 264 15% 264 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 21.2% Great: 22%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	8	6	60	15.5"	1280 720	AUO38ED

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 80K4 Builds (Compare 37 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 35%

Jet ski

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80K4

CPU
A10-8700P Radeon R6, 10 Compute Cores 4C+6GAMDBench 32%, 2,254 samples	31x
FX-8800P Radeon R7, 12 Compute Cores 4C+8GAMDBench 38%, 1,544 samples	5x
A8-8600P Radeon R6, 10 Compute Cores 4C+6GAMDBench 33%, 146 samples	1x

GPU
Radeon R6 GraphicsAMDBench 4%, 3,679 samples	20x
Radeon R6AMDBench 4%, 343 samples	6x
Radeon R6 GraphicsAMDBench 4%, 3,569 samples	6x

SSD
LDH-256V2S 256GBLiteonBench 70%, 104 samples	3x
PLUS 1000GBSandiskBench 44%, 44,528 samples	2x
MZYLF128HCHP-000L2 128GBSamsungBench 49%, 3,311 samples	1x

RAM
M471B5173EB0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 46%, 19,666 samples	10x
RMT3170MN68F9F1600 2x4GBRAMAXELBench 42%, 3,176 samples	6x
M471B1G73EB0-YK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 27%, 39,427 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16