Acer Aspire XC-780

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics16.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive35.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAcer Aspire XC-780  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire XC-780
Memory9.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160426
Uptime1.5 Days
Run DateAug 19 '21 at 09:25
Run Duration190 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6400-$79
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
75.2% Very good
Memory 81.4
1-Core 107
2-Core 210
75% 133 Pts
4-Core 398
8-Core 403
53% 400 Pts
64-Core 386
24% 386 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Gigabyte(1458 375C) 2GB
CLim: 2164 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 471.41
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
16.3% Very poor
Lighting 19.9
Reflection 26.3
Parallax 20.8
16% 22.3 fps
MRender 21.2
Gravity 21.2
Splatting 18.9
17% 20.4 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 16.3%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston RBU-SNS8151S396GG 96GB
48GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S9FM02.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 40 48 36 36 39 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
35.1% Below average
Read 311
Write 64.8
Mixed 95.8
SusWrite 39.2
28% 128 MB/s
4K Read 25.1
4K Write 27
4K Mixed 7.8
62% 20 MB/s
DQ Read 97.9
DQ Write 17.1
DQ Mixed 3.7
16% 39.6 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 35.1%
Great: 55%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$33
868GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 179 198 199 200 198 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 196
Write 198
Mixed 77.3
SusWrite 190
120% 165 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
149% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 110%
Great: 112%
Toshiba External USB 3.0 500GB
162GB free, PID a007
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 71 76 76 76 75 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
31.7% Below average
Read 70.8
Write 70.5
Mixed 36.9
SusWrite 73.6
84% 63 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A5143DB0-CPB 0215 CMV8GX4M1A2133C15 12GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
45.9% Average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 16.9
MC Mixed 12.7
44% 15.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 13.2
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 77.9
51% 77.9 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 19: 2R 2G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
19% 22% 32 75 6 75 24.5" 1920 1080 AOC2590 2590G5
Typical Aspire XC-780 Builds (Compare 418 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire XC-780

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $161
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback